0
Back To Top Jump Location
Sign In  | Cart
Left Shadow
Right Shadow
Clinical Research |

Ventricular Arrhythmia After Cardiac Surgery: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes

Mikhael F. El-Chami, MD; Fadi J. Sawaya, MD; Patrick Kilgo, MS; William Stein, MD; Michael Halkos, MD; Vinod Thourani, MD; Omar M. Lattouf, MD; David B. Delurgio, MD; Robert A. Guyton, MD; John D. Puskas, MD; Angel R. Leon, MD
[+] Author Information

Dr. El-Chami has received a research grant from Medtronic Inc. (Minneapolis, Minnesota). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Mikhael F. El-Chami, Assistant Professor of Medicine-Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Medical Office Tower, 6th Floor, 550 Peachtree St. NE, Atlanta, GA 30308

Copyright 2012, American College of Cardiology Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(25):2664-2671. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1011
Published online

Objectives  This study sought to investigate the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with post-operative ventricular arrhythmia (POVA) in a large cohort of patients.

Background  New-onset POVA after cardiac surgery (CS) is uncommon and has controversial prognostic value.

Methods  A total of 14,720 consecutive patients undergoing CS at Emory University between January 2004 and July 2010 were included in the study. Data on all-cause mortality were obtained from Social Security Administration death records. Multivariable regression models were constructed to determine the risk factors for POVA and to estimate the independent impact of POVA on long-term survival after adjusting for 40 different covariates.

Results  POVA occurred in 248 patients (1.7%). Patients with POVA were older (63.5 vs. 61.6 years), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (43.7 vs. 51.3), and had greater comorbidities (Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk score of 7.2% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.018 per 1-year increase, p < 0.001), emergent surgery (OR: 1.77, p = 0.019), and the presence of PVD (OR: 1.41, p = 0.049) were associated with a higher incidence of POVA, whereas higher left ventricular EF (OR: 0.97 per 1% increase, p < 0.001), mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 0.37, p < 0.001), and off-pump surgery (OR: O.41, p < 0.001) were associated with a lower incidence of POVA. POVA was associated with substantially increased adjusted long-term mortality (hazard rate: 2.53, p < 0.001) over 3.5 years of follow-up.

Conclusions  POVA is associated with increased long-term mortality after CS. Older age, PVD, lower EF, and emergent surgery are associated with a higher risk of POVA, whereas off-pump surgery seems to be protective.

Figures in this Article

Coronary artery disease (CAD), structural heart disease, and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction are among the factors that predispose to malignant ventricular arrhythmia (VA) (1). The incidence of VA and its impact on patients with CAD and LV dysfunction are well described ((2),(3),(4),5). Cardiac surgery (CS) exposes patients with a substrate for VA to various arrhythmic triggers, such as ischemia, reperfusion injury, hemodynamic changes, and electrolyte shifts, that could lead to post-operative VA (POVA). Of note, the reported incidence of POVA after CS is low, ranging from 0.95% to 3.2% ((6),(7),8). Thus, an analysis of POVA and its effect on patient outcomes requires a large cohort of patients undergoing CS. In this study, we sought to investigate the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with POVA undergoing CS in a large cohort of patients.

Study protocol

This study was a retrospective cohort analysis to look for associations between POVA and long-term outcomes. We queried the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Database to identify consecutive patients undergoing CS at Emory University between January 2004 and July 2010. The entire cohort consisted of 14,720 patients. The extracted data included demographic variables, pre-existing comorbidities, operation type, and clinical outcomes. The Emory University Institutional Review Board approved the protocol in compliance with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act standards and the Declaration of Helsinki. The institutional review board waived obtaining individual informed consent before obtaining the data on these patients.

The primary study variable was the onset of POVA, defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (lasting ≥30 s or requiring cardioversion) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (242/248 patients met this criteria). The remaining 6 patients had frequent salvos of nonsustained VT that did not meet the 30-second duration, but the episodes were frequent, requiring intravenous antiarrhythmic drugs and transfer to an intensive care unit. POVA, as entered in the STS database, is defined as VT or VF with no specification as to which type is present. Thus, the charts of patients with POVA were reviewed to determine the mechanism of POVA (VT vs. VF) and the timing of POVA occurrence (≤48 vs. >48 h after surgery) when these variables were available from the medical record. We calculate the primary endpoint, the survival time after surgery, using the date of death of patients in the cohort, as identified by the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), a publicly available national database of death records extracted from the U.S. Social Security Administration's Death Master File Extract. The SSDI provided the date of death for each patient who died before the cutoff date of June 30, 2010, allowing computation of the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates and associated Cox regressions. Patients alive on this date were considered censored, and those undergoing operation after June 30, 2010, were excluded from survival analyses. Because the SSDI does not list the cause of death, the analysis describes all-cause long-term mortality.

To help determine the independent impact of POVA on survival, 40 risk factors of long-term mortality were identified and harvested from the STS database for use in a risk-adjusted analysis. Covariates included in the model are listed in (Table 1).

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 1Covariates Included in the Associative Regression Model

Missing data from the several selected variables included Caucasian race (n = 18, 0.1%), body mass index (n = 81, 0.6%), body surface area (n = 30, 0.2%), hemoglobin A1C (n = 1,765, 12.0%), height (n = 29, 0.2%), last creatinine level (n = 61, 0.4%), ejection fraction (EF) (n = 1,012, 6.9%), and number of diseased vessels (n = 1,200, 8.2%). Multiple imputation strategies were used in the final regression models to minimize the selection bias effect inherent in missing data settings.

Statistical analysis

Bivariate predictors of POVA were identified using 2-sample t tests and chi-square tests for numeric and categoric variables, respectively. These statistically significant variables were entered into an associative logistic regression, allowing the determination of independent predictors of POVA. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using this analysis.

Unadjusted survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimation. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare survival between patients with and without POVA. Two further stratifications were made in patients with POVA: (a) timing of POVA (> or ≤48 h) and (b) type of POVA (VF or VT, when available). To statistically evaluate the independent effect of POVA on long-term mortality, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was constructed that related survival time as a function of POVA while adjusting for 46 collected covariates to reduce confounding bias. Adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) and 95% CIs were calculated for POVA and the 46 covariates.

All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). No adjustments for multiple tests were performed.

Cohort characteristics

In total, 14,720 patients were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were white men with a mean age of 61.7 years. More than 80% of the cohort had hypertension, one-third of patients had diabetes, and 36% of patients had the diagnosis of congestive heart failure. A total of 8,863 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (60.2%), 3,238 patients underwent isolated valve surgery (22%), and 1,412 patients underwent combined CABG and valve surgery (9.6%). Half of all surgeries were performed off-pump (Table 2). POVA occurred in 248 patients (1.7%). (Table 2) shows the characteristics of patients with and without POVA. Patients with POVA were older (63.5 vs. 61.6 years), had lower mean EF (43.5 % vs. 51.3%), were more likely to have congestive heart failure (56.9% vs. 35.9%), and underwent emergent surgery (14.9% vs. 6.4%). The POVA group had more comorbidities with higher STS mortality risk score (9) (7.2% vs. 3.1%). Of note, patients with POVA were less likely to have undergone off-pump coronary artery bypass (27.0% vs. 50.6%) (Table 2). The mean length of stay for patients with POVA was double that of patients without POVA (16.3 vs. 8.03, p < 0.001).

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 2Demographic and Clinical Overview of the Patient Population
Independent predictors of POVA

After identifying the covariates associated with the occurrence of POVA in unadjusted bivariate analysis, a multivariable logistic regression model was performed to determine the independent predictors of POVA (Table 3). Six risk factors were identified as being independently associated with POVA. Older age was associated with 19.5% higher risk of POVA with each 10-year increase in age (OR: 1.019 per 1-year increase in age). The need for emergent surgery strongly predicted the occurrence of POVA (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.86). Higher EF protected against POVA (OR: 0.974, 95% CI: 0.965 to 0.983). Each 10% increase in EF decreased the odds of POVA by 26%. Off-pump surgery was associated with a 59% reduction in the odds of POVA compared with patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.55) (Table 3). The presence of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) predicted the occurrence of POVA, whereas the presence of mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) seemed to be protective (Table 3).

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 3Independent Predictors of POVA From a 24-Variable Associative Logistic Regression Model That Included All Bivariate (Unadjusted) Predictors of POVA
Survival analysis

POVA was associated with increased long-term mortality over a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Patients with POVA had worse long-term survival than those without POVA, with a high risk of death in the POVA group during the first 6 postsurgical months (6-month survival of POVA = 59.8% vs. 93.8% for POVA-free group). This difference in survival persisted over time (Figure 11_gr1).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve for Patients With POVA Versus Without POVA

Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing that patients with post-operative ventricular arrhythmia (POVA) have worse survival compared with patients without (p < 0.001).

After adjusting for the covariates, POVA was independently associated with a 153% increase in long-term mortality compared with POVA-free patients (AHR: 2.53, 95% CI: 2.09 to 3.06). To better elucidate the effect of POVA on long-term mortality without the confounding effect of in-hospital mortality and early competing risks, a secondary analysis excluded patients who died before hospital discharge. This analysis showed that POVA independently predicted an increase in long-term mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.94 (CI: 1.46 to 2.60, p < 0.001). Other significant independent prognosticators of long-term survival (with hospital deaths excluded) are shown in (Table 4).

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 4Independent Predictors of Long-Term Survival From an Associative Cox Proportional Hazards Model That Contained All 40 Covariates

Charts of patients with POVA were reviewed to determine the mechanism of arrhythmia (VT vs. VF); these data were missing on 111 patients (45%) with POVA. Among patients with POVA, VF had a higher early hazard of death and produced worse long-term survival (unadjusted HR: 1.95, p = 0.007) (Figure 11_gr2). POVA occurring 48 h after surgery demonstrated worse early mortality risk but an equivalent survival at 6 years compared with POVA occurring within 48 h of surgery (unadjusted HR: 1.16, p = 0.31) (Figure 11_gr3).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve for Patients With VT Versus VF

Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing that patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF) have worse survival compared with patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) (p = 0.007).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve by Timing of POVA

Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing that patients with early POVA (≤48 h) have similar survival as patients with late POVA (>48 h) (p = 0.31).

The calculated mortality of patients with POVA within the first year after excluding in-hospital death reached 18.5% (27of 146 patients died within 1 year after hospital discharge) (Figure 11_gr4). We attempted to identify the characteristics of patients who are at high risk of death in the first year after surgery; patients who died at 1 year were more likely to have a lower EF (39.6% vs. 45.9% p = 0.08), increased age (67.9 vs. 62.6 years p = 0.044), and an index MI leading to surgery (37.0% vs. 23.5% p = 0.15). Because of the small number of patients, the EF and index MI did not reach statistical significance but did exhibit a strong statistical trend (p = 0.08 and 0.15 for EF and MI, respectively).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

In-Hospital and Yearly Mortality After CS

The incidence of deaths is highest in-hospital (30.5% in the POVA group vs. 2.9% POVA-free group) and in the first year after cardiac surgery (CS) (18.5% in the POVA group vs. 6% in the POVA-free group). POVA = post-operative ventricular arrhythmia.

Management of patients with POVA

A total of 85 patients (34.3%) with POVA were treated with an antiarrhythmic drug (predominantly amiodarone). Twenty patients (8%) received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) before discharge (a decision guided by an electrophysiologic study in some patients).

This study provides the largest analysis to date of the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of POVA in patients undergoing heart surgery. The 1.7% incidence of POVA in our population is consistent with that in prior reports ((6),(7),8). Steinberg et al. (6) followed 382 patients undergoing CABG and found that 12 (3.2%) developed POVA. Two other reports, one from Canada and one from England, enrolled 4,784 and 4,411 patients and found the incidence of POVA was 0.95% and 1.6% ((7),8), respectively. The potentially beneficial effect of myocardial revascularization might account for the observed low incidence of POVA in a population with structural heart disease ((10),11). Also, the favorable effect of valve surgery on LV loading conditions might reduce the proarrhythmic stress and stretch and associated proarrhythmic risk (12).

Predictors of POVA

The current retrospective analysis identified 4 factors predisposing to POVA: increased age, lower EF, the need for emergent surgery, and PVD. Conversely, we found that off-pump surgery and mild COPD were associated with a lower chance of POVA. Advanced age repeatedly appears as a risk factor for long-term mortality after CS ((13),14). Two studies looking at risk of POVA after CS found that patients with POVA are older than patients without POVA ((6),8). Conversely, another study found that age <65 years at the time of surgery was a risk factor for POVA (7). LV dysfunction, expressed as a lower EF, also predicted POVA; the mean EF in patients with POVA in our study was 43.5% versus 51.3% for the group without POVA. A low EF also strongly predicted risk for POVA in prior studies that evaluated predictors of POVA after CS ((6),(7),8). The results of randomized clinical trials reinforce the role of EF as a major risk factor for predicting death in patients with or without associated coronary disease and myocardial infarction (MI) ((4),5). The need for emergent CABG also strongly predicted POVA in our patients. Emergency CABG generally carries a higher risk of in-hospital mortality and added requirements for hemodynamic support, such as the intra-aortic balloon pump and intravenous inotropes (15). Patients requiring emergency CABG typically have a higher CAD burden, intractable ischemia, LV dysfunction, and pre-operative hypotension or shock (15), all factors that contribute to the risk of VA.

Ascione et al. (7) reported a trend toward a reduction in POVA with the use of off-pump surgery (47% reduction in the relative risk, p = 0.1) in a center where 23% of CABG cases were performed off-pump. We observed an association between use of an off-pump surgical technique and a 58% relative reduction in POVA at a center aggressively using the off-pump approach, with more than 80% of isolated CABGs performed off-pump. This protective effect of off-pump CABG remained significant when using an intention-to-treat definition of off-pump CABG (i.e., surgeries that start as off-pump and had to be converted to on-pump are analyzed as off-pump). Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass might protect against VA. A long on-pump time has been shown to predict POVA (8). The clinical consequences of cardiopulmonary bypass include systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, electrolyte shifts, release of vasoactive substances, and peripheral and cerebral emboli (16). Also, on-pump CABG is associated with a higher degree of myocardial injury evidenced by increased postsurgical troponin and creatinine kinase release ((17),18). Ischemia, myocardial injury, systemic inflammation, and electrolyte shifts may explain the higher risk of POVA observed with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Prior studies ((7),8) found an increased risk of POVA after heart surgery in women. In the current study, no gender-based difference in the incidence of POVA after heart surgery was observed. One possible explanation is that women in our series had higher rates of off-pump surgery than men (52.4% vs. 46%, p < 0.001), and its protective effect may have erased a gender-based difference.

The presence of PVD in this study is found to be predictive of POVA. PVD is associated with an increased risk of perioperative morbidity, including the risk of post-CABG atrial and VA ((19),20). It is also an independent predictor of mortality after CS (21). In addition, PVD is associated with multiple different comorbidities, such as LV dysfunction (22), which could predispose to VA. It is conceivable that PVD may signal severity of illness and the presence of multiple comorbidities that predispose to POVA.

Patients with moderate and severe COPD are at increased risk of post-CABG mortality ((23),24) and morbidity, including hospital length of stay, respiratory infections, and atrial fibrillation ((25),26). In our study, patients with mild COPD were less likely to have POVA. This may seem surprising given the association of COPD with worse outcomes after CABG. However, this association is mainly seen in patients with moderate or severe COPD, whereas mild COPD has not been demonstrated to predict worse outcome after CABG.

POVA and long-term survival

Prior studies have shown that POVA predicts higher (21.7% to 28.9%) in-hospital mortality compared with control (1.4% to 1.9%) ((7),8). Our data also show that the in-hospital mortality in patients with POVA was higher than in those without (31.5% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001). Ascione et al. (7) noted that the detrimental effect of POVA on long-term mortality disappeared after correcting for the effect of in-hospital death. We did find that the adjusted HR decreased from an AHR of 2.53 (95% CI: 2.09 to 3.06) to an AHR of 1.94 (95% CI: 1.46 to 2.60) after excluding patients who died in-hospital; however, POVA still predicted an increased risk of long-term mortality. This single study analyzed the long-term outcome of 248 patients with POVA. The 3 prior reports analyzed data from a combined total of 126 patients with POVA. The larger number of patients followed in this study may provide adequate statistical power to detect the effect of POVA on long-term mortality.

We should stress that most deaths in patients with POVA occur in the hospital and within the first year after discharge (Figure 11_gr4). The observed 1-year mortality in the POVA group exceeded the yearly probability of death seen in patients enrolled in the MADIT-II (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation trial-II) (4), a group with LV dysfunction associated with a previous MI. If one assumes that half of deaths resulted from VT or VF, as is generally the case in patients with CAD and LV dysfunction (27), these patients should be screened aggressively to look for markers of SCD with repeat ambulatory electrocardiography monitoring and/or provocative testing. Guidelines for an ICD as primary prevention of SCD currently exclude patients with an EF >0.35 and those within 90 days after undergoing surgical or percutaneous revascularization. Therefore, aggressive use of ambulatory electrocardiography monitoring to detect nonsustained VT or induction of VT during invasive electrophysiologic study would be needed to identify postsurgical patients who would be indicated to receive an ICD. Also, more aggressive use of a wearable defibrillator for a few months after discharge might protect those at risk during the first year after surgery.

We were able to compare the effect of timing of POVA on long-term outcome. POVA occurring within 48 h of CS resulted in similar long-term outcomes as POVA occurring >48 h after CS (p = 0.31). The prognostic significance of VA early after surgery has been unclear, given that the unstable electrical milieu early after cardiopulmonary bypass and reperfusion may produce transient electrical instability not associated with chronic risk. Likewise, patients with VA emerging early (<24 to 48 h) after MI have a better prognosis than patients with VA late after MI (>24 to 48 h) (28). Early-onset VA may result from acute ischemia or reperfusion injury, 2 potentially reversible conditions, and thus early POVA may have better outcomes than late POVA. Our data suggest that the timing of POVA (early vs. late) does not influence long-term outcome and challenge the traditional notion that early POVA has little if any long-term prognostic value and should be ignored after treating the acute episode. This analysis is limited by the availability of POVA timing data on only 154 of 248 patients (62%).

We also noted that patients with VF after CS have worse long-term survival than patients with VT (p = 0.007). This was mainly due to the strong impact of early death seen in patients with VF, an expected finding because VF results in immediate hemodynamic collapse whereas VT may support perfusion long enough to allow recognition and treatment before hemodynamic collapse. The availability of data on VA mechanism (55% of all POVAs) also potentially limits this analysis.

Study limitations

This is a single-center retrospective study analyzing the predictors and outcomes of patients with VA after CS, and thus it is subject to the same bias-based limitations affecting all such retrospective observational studies. The STS database was not designed to study the effect of POVA on long-term mortality or to determine the predictors of POVA. Therefore, the covariates included in the regression models might miss important factors that might have affected the association between POVA and long-term mortality. The SSDI reports all-cause mortality; therefore, data on cardiac and arrhythmic mortality are lacking. The charts of all patients with POVA were reviewed to confirm the accurate sustained and malignant nature of these arrhythmias. However, it is conceivable that some patients with wide complex tachycardia could have been misdiagnosed with VT, whereas the actual rhythm is supraventricular arrhythmia with aberrant conduction. In addition, some sustained but short episodes of hemodynamically stable POVA could have been missed. The bias reduction methods involve the construction of large models for POVA and long-term mortality that run the risk of poor estimation of effects via “over-fitting.” Furthermore, a small amount of missing data existed, and although sophisticated statistical methods were used to alleviate bias, the incomplete data collection could still result in less than optimal inferences. However, the large number of patients enrolled in this study and the long-term follow-up do suggest that POVA predicts long-term mortality after CS and that most of the mortality difference is secondary to a high rate of in-hospital death and within the first year after surgery in the POVA group.

In this large cohort of patients undergoing CS at Emory University, we have shown that older age, lower EF, and emergent surgery predisposes to POVA, whereas off-pump surgery is found to be protective against its occurrence. More important, POVA is associated with increased long-term mortality despite excluding in-hospital death.

Huikuri  H.V., Castellanos  A., Myerburg  R.J.; Sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1473-1482.
CrossRef
The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators,  A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1576-1583.
CrossRef
Buxton  A.E., Lee  K.L., DiCarlo  L.; Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at risk for sudden death. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1937-1945.
CrossRef
Moss  A.J., Zareba  W., Hall  W.J.; Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877-883.
CrossRef
Bardy  G.H., Lee  K.L., Mark  D.B.; Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:225-237.
CrossRef
Steinberg  J.S., Gaur  A., Sciacca  R., Tan  E.; New-onset sustained ventricular tachycardia after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;99:903-908.
CrossRef
Ascione  R., Reeves  B.C., Santo  K., Khan  N., Angelini  G.D.; Predictors of new malignant ventricular arrhythmias after coronary surgery: a case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1630-1638.
CrossRef
Yeung-Lai-Wah  J.A., Qi  A., McNeill  E.; New-onset sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation early after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:2083-2088.
CrossRef
Shahian  D.M., O'Brien  S.M., Filardo  G.; The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1—coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:S2-S22.
CrossRef
O'Rourke  R.A.; Role of myocardial revascularization in sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1992;85:I112-I117.
Bigger  J.T.; Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary-artery bypass graft surgery. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1569-1575.
CrossRef
Rosen  S., Lahorra  M., Cohen  M.V., Buttrick  P.; Ventricular fibrillation threshold is influenced by left ventricular stretch and mass in the absence of ischaemia. Cardiovasc Res. 1991;25:458-462.
CrossRef
Vogt  A., Grube  E., Glunz  H.G.; Determinants of mortality after cardiac surgery: results of the registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausarzte (ALKK) on 10 525 patients. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:28-32.
CrossRef
Toumpoulis  I.K., Anagnostopoulos  C.E., Toumpoulis  S.K., DeRose  J.J., Swistel  D.G.; EuroSCORE predicts long-term mortality after heart valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1902-1908.
CrossRef
Yang  E.H., Gumina  R.J., Lennon  R.J., Holmes  D.R., Rihal  C.S., Singh  M.; Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2004-2009.
CrossRef
Murphy  G.J., Angelini  G.D.; Side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass: what is the reality?. J Card Surg. 2004;19:481-488.
CrossRef
Puskas  J.D., Williams  W.H., Duke  P.G.; Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:797-808.
CrossRef
Czerny  M., Baumer  H., Kilo  J.; Inflammatory response and myocardial injury following coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:737-742.
CrossRef
Collison  T., Smith  J.M., Engel  A.M.; Peripheral vascular disease and outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1214-1219.
CrossRef
Loponen  P., Taskinen  P., Laakkonen  E.; Peripheral vascular disease as predictor of outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Scand J Surg. 2002;91:160-165.
Birkmeyer  J.D., O'Connor  G.T., Quinton  H.B.; The effect of peripheral vascular disease on in-hospital mortality rates with coronary artery bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:445-452.
CrossRef
Kelly  R., Staines  A., MacWalter  R., Stonebridge  P., Tunstall-Pedoe  H., Struthers  A.D.; The prevalence of treatable left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients who present with noncardiac vascular episodes: a case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:219-224.
CrossRef
Saleh  H.Z., Mohan  K., Shaw  M.; Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing non-emergent coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:108-113.
CrossRef
Adabag  A.S., Wassif  H.S., Rice  K.; Pre-operative pulmonary function and mortality after cardiac surgery. Am Heart J. 2010;159:691-697.
CrossRef
Manganas  H., Lacasse  Y., Bourgeois  S., Perron  J., Dagenais  F., Maltais  F.; Post-operative outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Can Respir J. 2007;14:19-24.
Mathew  J.P., Fontes  M.L., Tudor  I.C.; A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA. 2004;291:1720-1729.
CrossRef
Bunch  T.J., Hohnloser  S.H., Gersh  B.J.; Mechanisms of sudden cardiac death in myocardial infarction survivors: insights from the randomized trials of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation. 2007;115:2451-2457.
CrossRef
Behar  S., Kishon  Y., Reicher-Reiss  H.; Prognosis of early versus late ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 1994;45:191-198.
CrossRef

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve for Patients With POVA Versus Without POVA

Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing that patients with post-operative ventricular arrhythmia (POVA) have worse survival compared with patients without (p < 0.001).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve for Patients With VT Versus VF

Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing that patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF) have worse survival compared with patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) (p = 0.007).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve by Timing of POVA

Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing that patients with early POVA (≤48 h) have similar survival as patients with late POVA (>48 h) (p = 0.31).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

In-Hospital and Yearly Mortality After CS

The incidence of deaths is highest in-hospital (30.5% in the POVA group vs. 2.9% POVA-free group) and in the first year after cardiac surgery (CS) (18.5% in the POVA group vs. 6% in the POVA-free group). POVA = post-operative ventricular arrhythmia.

Tables

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 1Covariates Included in the Associative Regression Model
Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 2Demographic and Clinical Overview of the Patient Population
Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 3Independent Predictors of POVA From a 24-Variable Associative Logistic Regression Model That Included All Bivariate (Unadjusted) Predictors of POVA
Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 4Independent Predictors of Long-Term Survival From an Associative Cox Proportional Hazards Model That Contained All 40 Covariates

Interactive Graphics

Video

References

Huikuri  H.V., Castellanos  A., Myerburg  R.J.; Sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1473-1482.
CrossRef
The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators,  A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1576-1583.
CrossRef
Buxton  A.E., Lee  K.L., DiCarlo  L.; Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at risk for sudden death. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1937-1945.
CrossRef
Moss  A.J., Zareba  W., Hall  W.J.; Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877-883.
CrossRef
Bardy  G.H., Lee  K.L., Mark  D.B.; Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:225-237.
CrossRef
Steinberg  J.S., Gaur  A., Sciacca  R., Tan  E.; New-onset sustained ventricular tachycardia after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;99:903-908.
CrossRef
Ascione  R., Reeves  B.C., Santo  K., Khan  N., Angelini  G.D.; Predictors of new malignant ventricular arrhythmias after coronary surgery: a case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1630-1638.
CrossRef
Yeung-Lai-Wah  J.A., Qi  A., McNeill  E.; New-onset sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation early after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:2083-2088.
CrossRef
Shahian  D.M., O'Brien  S.M., Filardo  G.; The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1—coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:S2-S22.
CrossRef
O'Rourke  R.A.; Role of myocardial revascularization in sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1992;85:I112-I117.
Bigger  J.T.; Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary-artery bypass graft surgery. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1569-1575.
CrossRef
Rosen  S., Lahorra  M., Cohen  M.V., Buttrick  P.; Ventricular fibrillation threshold is influenced by left ventricular stretch and mass in the absence of ischaemia. Cardiovasc Res. 1991;25:458-462.
CrossRef
Vogt  A., Grube  E., Glunz  H.G.; Determinants of mortality after cardiac surgery: results of the registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausarzte (ALKK) on 10 525 patients. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:28-32.
CrossRef
Toumpoulis  I.K., Anagnostopoulos  C.E., Toumpoulis  S.K., DeRose  J.J., Swistel  D.G.; EuroSCORE predicts long-term mortality after heart valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1902-1908.
CrossRef
Yang  E.H., Gumina  R.J., Lennon  R.J., Holmes  D.R., Rihal  C.S., Singh  M.; Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2004-2009.
CrossRef
Murphy  G.J., Angelini  G.D.; Side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass: what is the reality?. J Card Surg. 2004;19:481-488.
CrossRef
Puskas  J.D., Williams  W.H., Duke  P.G.; Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:797-808.
CrossRef
Czerny  M., Baumer  H., Kilo  J.; Inflammatory response and myocardial injury following coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:737-742.
CrossRef
Collison  T., Smith  J.M., Engel  A.M.; Peripheral vascular disease and outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1214-1219.
CrossRef
Loponen  P., Taskinen  P., Laakkonen  E.; Peripheral vascular disease as predictor of outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Scand J Surg. 2002;91:160-165.
Birkmeyer  J.D., O'Connor  G.T., Quinton  H.B.; The effect of peripheral vascular disease on in-hospital mortality rates with coronary artery bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:445-452.
CrossRef
Kelly  R., Staines  A., MacWalter  R., Stonebridge  P., Tunstall-Pedoe  H., Struthers  A.D.; The prevalence of treatable left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients who present with noncardiac vascular episodes: a case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:219-224.
CrossRef
Saleh  H.Z., Mohan  K., Shaw  M.; Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing non-emergent coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:108-113.
CrossRef
Adabag  A.S., Wassif  H.S., Rice  K.; Pre-operative pulmonary function and mortality after cardiac surgery. Am Heart J. 2010;159:691-697.
CrossRef
Manganas  H., Lacasse  Y., Bourgeois  S., Perron  J., Dagenais  F., Maltais  F.; Post-operative outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Can Respir J. 2007;14:19-24.
Mathew  J.P., Fontes  M.L., Tudor  I.C.; A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA. 2004;291:1720-1729.
CrossRef
Bunch  T.J., Hohnloser  S.H., Gersh  B.J.; Mechanisms of sudden cardiac death in myocardial infarction survivors: insights from the randomized trials of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation. 2007;115:2451-2457.
CrossRef
Behar  S., Kishon  Y., Reicher-Reiss  H.; Prognosis of early versus late ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 1994;45:191-198.
CrossRef

Correspondence

Latest JACC CME

Continuing Medical Education through JACC is a convenient way to fulfill your CME requirements while learning important information about the latest advances in cardiovascular medicine.

April 2013- JACC CME Activity
Repeat Revascularization and Outcome

March 2013- JACC CME Activity
Extreme Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Improved Cardiovascular Risk Prediction

Feb 2013- JACC CME Activity
Results from the BARI 2D Trial

Jan 2013- JACC CME Activity
Prognosis Among Healthy Individuals Discharged With a Primary Diagnosis of Syncope

Dec 2012- JACC CME Activity
Incidence of Heart Failure or Cardiomyopathy After Adjuvant Trastuzumab Therapy for Breast Cancer

Nov 2012- JACC CME Activity
A Collaborative Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 10 Randomized Trials

Oct 2012- JACC CME Activity
Radiofrequency Ablation of Premature Ventricular Ectopy Improves the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Nonresponders

Sept 2012- JACC CME Activity
Exercise and Pharmacological Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

Aug 2012- JACC CME Activity
Reduction in Life-Threatening Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Statin-Treated Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Enrolled in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)

July 2012- JACC CME Activity
Relationship of Beta-Blocker Dose With Outcomes in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients With Systolic Dysfunction

For previous CME quizzes, please follow this link to CardioSource Lifelong Learning and MOC.

 

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Editorial Content
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles