0
Back To Top Jump Location
Sign In  | Cart
Left Shadow
Right Shadow
Clinical research: valvular heart disease |

Prevention of ischemic mitral regurgitation does not influence the outcome of remodeling after posterolateral myocardial infarction FREE

T.Sloane Guy, IV, MD; Sina L Moainie, MD; Joseph H Gorman, III, MD; Benjamin M Jackson, MD; Theodore Plappert, CVT; Yoshiharu Enomoto, MD; Martin G St. John-Sutton, MBBS, FACC; L.Henry Edmunds, Jr, MD; Robert C Gorman, MD
[+] Author Information

This work was supported by grants HL63954 and HL71137 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; a grant from the Mary L. Smith Charitable Trust, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania; and the W.W. Smith Charitable Trust, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. Dr. Guy was supported by a National Research Service Award (HL10498) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Robert C. Gorman, Department of Surgery, 6 Silverstein, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

American College of Cardiology Foundation

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(3):377-383. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.045
Published online

Objectives  This study was designed to test the hypothesis that ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) results from, but does not influence, the progression of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after posterolateral infarction.

Background  Surgical correction of chronic IMR is being increasingly recommended.

Methods  Three groups of sheep had coronary snares placed around the second and third obtuse marginal coronary arteries. Occlusion of these vessels in the control group resulted in progressive IMR over eight weeks. In a second group, Merseline mesh was fitted to cover the exposed LV before infarction. In a third group, a ring annuloplasty was placed before infarction to prevent IMR. Remodeling and degree of IMR were assessed with echocardiography at baseline and at 30 min and two, five, and eight weeks after infarction.

Results  Eight weeks after infarction, mean IMR grade was significantly higher in control animals than mesh and annuloplasty animals. At eight weeks, LV end-systolic volume and end-systolic muscle-to-cavity-area ratio (ESMCAR) were significantly better in mesh-treated sheep than in control sheep; also, at eight weeks, ESMCAR and akinetic segment length were significantly better in mesh-treated sheep than in annuloplasty sheep. Ejection fraction was significantly higher in the mesh than the annuloplasty group. There was no significant difference in any measure of remodeling between the annuloplasty and control groups.

Conclusions  Prophylactic ventricular restraint reduces infarct expansion, attenuates adverse remodeling, and reduces IMR severity. Prevention of IMR by prophylactic ring annuloplasty does not influence remodeling. Ischemic mitral regurgitation is a consequence, not a cause, of postinfarction remodeling; infarct expansion is the more important therapeutic target.

Figures in this Article
ANOVA

analysis of variance

CHF

congestive heart failure

EF

ejection fraction

ESMCAR

end-systolic muscle-to-cavity-area ratio

IMR

ischemic mitral regurgitation

IV

intravenous

LV

left ventricle

LVEDV

left ventricular end-diastolic volume

LVESV

left ventricular end-systolic volume

LVP

left ventricular pressure

MI

myocardial infarction

WMA

wall motion abnormality

Myocardial infarctions (MIs) often initiate a remodeling process that leads to gross ventricular distortion, contractile dysfunction of normally perfused myocardium, symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF), and premature death (12). Depending on size, location, and transmurality of the infarct, the remodeling process may be associated with the development of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) (15). Mild degrees of mitral regurgitation after acute MI portend a substantially increased risk of cardiovascular mortality within five years, even in patients who do not initially have signs of overt CHF (6).

Increasing awareness of the poor prognosis associated with IMR has stimulated much debate regarding the best treatment for these patients. Valve replacement or (preferably) valve repair are being increasingly recommended even for moderate IMR, especially when coronary bypass grafting is indicated. However, careful assessment of the most recent and thoroughly analyzed surgical series leads to the conclusion that surgical intervention for IMR provides little benefit compared to medical therapy for CHF (4,7). The results are predictable and sobering: a steady, almost linear loss of patients, culminating in a five-year survival of 50% (4,78)

These clinical results suggest that IMR is a consequence of postinfarction remodeling and does not itself contribute to the progression of the phenomenon. Early infarct expansion is associated with the development of progressive ventricular dilation (1,9), a myopathic process in normally perfused myocardium (1011), and poor long-term prognosis (1). We therefore hypothesized that infarct expansion is the major stimulus for adverse remodeling and greatly outweighs any contribution from gradually progressive mitral valve incompetence.

We tested the hypothesis using a well-established sheep model of chronic IMR in which the development of IMR was prevented by prophylactic ring annuloplasty in one group of animals and infarct expansion was minimized by ventricular restraint in another.

Surgical protocol

Twenty-two Dorset male hybrid sheep (Animal Biotech Industries, Doylestown, Pennsylvania) weighing 35 to 40 kg were used for this study. Animals were treated under an experimental protocol approved by the University of Pennsylvania's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and in compliance with NIH publication No. 85-23 as revised in 1985.

Animals were induced with thiopental sodium (10 to 15 mg/kg intravenously [IV]) and intubated. Anesthesia was maintained with isofluorane (1.5% to 2%) and oxygen. All animals received glycopyrrolate (0.4 mg IV) and enrofloxin (10 mg/kg IV) on induction.

Under aseptic conditions, all animals underwent left thoracotomy. Polypropylene snares were loosely placed around the second and third obtuse marginal branches of the circumflex artery supplying the posterolateral LV wall (12). Group assignment was random. Ten animals (control group) underwent closure of the thoracotomy and recovery. Five animals (annuloplasty group) underwent placement of a 24-mm mitral annuloplasty ring (Carpentier-Edwards Physio, Edwards Life Science, Irvine, California) using standard cardiac surgical techniques. Following termination of cardiopulmonary bypass and decannulation, these animals underwent closure of the thoracotomy and were recovered. Seven animals (wrap group) had an appropriately sized piece of Merseline mesh sutured in place over the LV from base to apex and from left anterior descending coronary artery to posterior descending coronary artery; these animals, too, then underwent thoracotomy closure and recovery.

Baseline data and infarction

Fourteen days after initial instrumentation, sheep were again anesthetized. The surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and arterial blood pressure were continuously monitored (Sonometrics Inc., London, Canada) and recorded during all data collection procedures. A high-fidelity pressure transducer (SPC-350, Millar Instruments Inc., Houston, Texas) was inserted via a femoral artery into the left ventricle (LV) for continuous pressure (LVP) monitoring (78534c monitor, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, California). A pulmonary artery catheter (131-h, 7fr, Baxter Healthcare Corp, Deerfield, Illinois) was placed; thermodilution cardiac output was measured in triplicate at each time point for each animal. Animals were disconnected from the ventilator and atrially paced at 120 beats/min for all measurements and echocardiograms.

After baseline hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were recorded, the subcutaneous snares were exposed, tightened, and tied to produce infarction. Each animal received magnesium sulfate (1 g IV), bretylium (10 mg/kg IV), and lidocaine (3 mg/kg IV bolus, then 2 mg/min infusion) before infarction. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were collected 30 min after infarction.

Echocardiography

Quantitative two-dimensional subdiaphragmatic echocardiograms were obtained before infarction and at 30 min and 2, 5, and 8 weeks after infarction (1) A sterile midline laparotomy (or right or left subcostal incision) was made and subdiaphragmatic two-dimensional echocardiographic images were obtained using a 5 MHz probe (77020A, Hewlett Packard). Images were recorded on VHS videotape at 30 Hz (Panasonic AG-6300 VHS Recorder). Left ventricular short-axis images at three levels (the tips of the papillary muscles, the bases of the papillary muscles, and the apex) and two orthogonal long-axis views were recorded. Previous reports validated the reproducibility and effectiveness of this technique for evaluating LV remodeling in sheep (1314). Left ventricular volumes at end-systole (LVESV) and end-diastole (LVEDV) were calculated using Simpson's rule and normalized to preinfarction values (15). Ejection fraction (EF) was calculated from LVESV and LVEDV. End-systolic muscle-to-cavity-area ratio (ESMCAR) and the circumferential length of the posterolateral wall motion abnormality (WMA) at the high papillary muscle level were also determined at each time point. The severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) was assessed quantitatively as the area of the regurgitant jet as a percentage of left atrial area in the apical four-chamber view. The following grading was used: grade 1 >20%; grade 2 = 20% to 40%, grade 3 = 40% to 60% and grade 4 >60% (16).

Follow-up studies

Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were collected at 30 min and two, five, and eight weeks after infarction. Following the eight-week study, the animals were euthanized (80 mEq potassium chloride IV bolus). The heart was excised and photographed to confirm infarction size and location.

Statistics

Measurements are reported as means ± standard error of the mean. Between-group differences in all continuous dependent variables (all but MR grade) are compared by analysis of variance for repeated measures. If analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant differences, Student's t test with the Bonferroni correction was used to assess differences between groups at specific time points post infarction (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). For each significantly different dependent variable a maximum of six Bonferroni-corrected t tests were performed at a given time point. Differences in the degree of mitral regurgitation between groups were assessed using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. To evaluate the differences in MR between any two groups at specific time points the Mann-Whitney test with the Bonferroni correction was used. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

Hemodynamic data

No significant differences in LVEDP, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, or cardiac output were observed between groups at any of the time points studied (Table le1).

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 1Hemodynamic Data
Echocardiographic data

Echocardiographic data are summarized in (Table le1). As expected, the control group developed progressive and severe MR (3.4 ± 0.3) during the study period. The MR in the control group was significantly more than in either the annuloplasty (0.6 ± 0.4) or the wrap (1.2 ± 0.3) groups. There was no significant difference in MR between the annuloplasty and wrap groups at any individual time point (Figure 1).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Degree of mitral regurgitation (MR) graded on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = no MR, 4 = severe MR) in control group (squares), annuloplasty group (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). By the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test with MR as the dependent variable and considering all experimental time points, the wrap, annuloplasty, and control groups are all significantly different (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).

Normalized LVESV at eight weeks was not altered by prophylactic annuloplasty (2.05 ± 0.29) when compared with controls (2.22 ± 0.21). By ANOVA, considering all experimental time points, the wrap group was significantly different from both the control and annuloplasty groups with respect to LVESV (Figure 2). Specifically, at eight weeks, LVESV in the wrap group (1.48 ± 0.25) was significantly reduced when compared with the control group. Changes in normalized LVEDV followed a similar pattern (Table le2), though between-group comparisons did not reach statistical significance.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Normalized left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) in control group (squares), annuloplasty group (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). The LVESV increased significantly in the control and annuloplasty groups at eight weeks but not in the wrap group. By analysis of variance, considering all experimental time points, the wrap group was significantly different from both the annuloplasty and the control groups. The annuloplasty group was not significantly different from the controls.

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 2Echocardiography Data
Table Footer Note*p < 0.05 compared to preinfarction within group.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared to control group.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared to annuloplasty group. All results expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean.

End-systolic muscle-to-cavity-area ratio was preserved in the wrap group, but decreased significantly in both the annuloplasty and control groups: there was a significant difference in the wrap group ESMCAR (1.63 ± 0.14) at eight weeks when compared with both the annuloplasty (1.09 ± 0.17) and control (1.15 ± 0.12) groups (Figure 3). The circumferential length of the akinetic segment of myocardium at the high papillary muscle level (WMA) was significantly reduced immediately after infarction in the wrap group (2.9 ± 0.3 cm) when compared to both the annuloplasty (4.1 ± 0.4 cm) and control (4.5 ± 0.4 cm) groups (Figure 4), indicating that the wrap was effective in reducing early infarct expansion.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

End-systolic muscle-to-cavity-area ratio (ESMCAR) in control group (squares), annuloplasty group (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). The ESMCAR did not change during postinfarction remodeling in the wrap group. By analysis of variance, considering all experimental time points, ESMCAR was significantly reduced in both the annuloplasty and control groups when compared with the wrap group. There was no significant difference between the control and annuloplasty groups.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Length of the circumferential wall motion abnormality at the high papillary muscle level (WMA) in control group (squares), annuloplasty group (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). By analysis of variance, considering all experimental time points, the WMA was significantly greater in the annuloplasty and control groups when compared to the wrap group. There was no statistical difference between the control and annuloplasty groups.

Ejection fraction was preserved in the wrap group (Figure 5). By ANOVA, considering all experimental time points, the annuloplasty group EF was significantly worse than both the control and wrap groups with respect to EF. The control and wrap groups were not statistically different. By Student's t test (with Bonferroni correction), the EF was significantly worse in the annuloplasty group at eight weeks (25.3 ± 2.9%) compared to the wrap group (36.5 ± 2.4%).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Ejection fraction (EF) in control group (squares), annuloplasty (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). By analysis of variance, considering all experimental time points, the EF in the annuloplasty group was significantly less than both the wrap and control groups. There was no statistical difference between the control and wrap groups.

Ring annuloplasty was highly effective in preventing the development of IMR in this established ovine model; however, it had no demonstrable effect on postinfarction ventricular remodeling. In contrast, ventricular wrapping reduced acute infarct expansion, preserved EF, and significantly improved measured parameters of postinfarction remodeling. Additionally, ventricular wrapping was as effective as ring annuloplasty in preventing the development of IMR.

A potential limitation of this study was the fact that only the ring annuloplasty group had open-heart surgery and the associated need for a period of aortic cross-clamping with protected global ischemia. We were meticulously attentive with regard to myocardial protection during these procedures. The fact that there was no statistical difference in the preinfarction EF between groups indicates that intraoperative myocardial protection was adequate.

Clinically, IMR occurs most commonly after moderately sized posterolateral infarctions involving the posterior papillary muscle (45,17). The degree of mitral regurgitation is typically small initially but increases, often to severe levels, over a varying time course. The model of IMR used in this experiment faithfully replicates the human disease.

Recent laboratory (10,18) and clinical studies (11) have shown that expansion (stretching) of a transmural MI initiates a progressive myopathic process in normally perfused myocardium. This phenomenon is initially localized to myocardium immediately adjacent to the infarct, but extends during the remodeling process to convert contiguous normally perfused myocardium into hypocontractile remodeled myocardium. The stretch-induced myopathic process has been associated with myocyte apoptosis (14) and disruption of the extracellular matrix secondary to activation of matrix metalloproteinases (19). The failure of surgical reshaping operations to improve survival in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients (2022) strongly suggests that infarct-induced myopathy is very difficult to reverse once established.

Using contrast echocardiography, Jackson et al. (23) has demonstrated that early postinfarction geometric changes consistent with increased regional wall stress occur in the borderzone region adjacent to infarcts undergoing early expansion and subsequent remodeling. A finite-element analysis by Guccione et al. (18) confirms these findings and also demonstrates that once the myopathic process is fully developed, contractile function in nonischemic myocardium is impaired beyond what would be expected from changes in LV geometry and stress distribution. Therefore, early after-infarction loss of contractility is due to mechanical factors; as remodeling progresses the geometric contribution (stress) to myocardial dysfunction is likely outstripped by the myopathic phenomenon that it initiates in normally perfused myocardium. It is for this reason that most operations for established heart failure are ineffective. The salutary effect of ventricular wrapping demonstrated in this study is likely due to its ability to attenuate early infarct expansion, thereby reducing adverse remodeling.

Elimination of moderate to severe ischemic mitral regurgitation, either by valve replacement or valve repair, is an increasingly recommended treatment for patients with symptomatic CHF (4,7). This trend has been driven by improvements in mitral valvuloplasty techniques and reduced perioperative mortality in patients with depressed LV function undergoing open-heart surgery. Recent large clinical studies, however, fail to demonstrate that addressing chronic IMR adds to patient survival beyond what would be expected from optimal medical management (4,78,24).

The primary intent of this study was to assess the relative contribution of infarct expansion and mitral regurgitation to remodeling after posterior infarctions that are predisposed to the development of progressive IMR. Our findings indicate that although chronic IMR is a manifestation of postinfarction LV remodeling it contributes minimally to perpetuating the phenomenon of progressive LV dilation. On the contrary, ventricular restraint that prevents infarct expansion dramatically influences the outcome of remodeling and secondarily prevents the development of MR.

The preemptive and prophylactic surgical interventions used in this study cannot, obviously, be directly applied clinically. They represent the best-case scenario of two very different therapeutic strategies. The results of the study do, however, have important clinical implications. Our findings indicate that relief (or prevention) of IMR has very little impact on remodeling. This helps to explain the negligible effect of mitral valve replacement or repair on survival in patients with IMR. This study confirms the results of earlier experiments in our laboratory (13,25), and in doing so reinforces the thesis that therapies that minimize infarct expansion early after acute MI are more likely to limit adverse postinfarction remodeling and thereby improve survival.

The threshold for surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation caused by primary valvular disease is declining because of improved repair techniques, reduced operative mortality, and proven benefits in reducing the incidence of irreversible LV dysfunction. Our data would caution against extrapolating these results to patients with IMR. In IMR, mitral regurgitation is a consequence rather than a cause of postinfarction left ventricular remodeling. As these data support, the primary therapeutic target is early infarct expansion, not late mitral regurgitation.

St. John-Sutton  M., Pfeffer  M.A., Moye  L.; Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction. baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial. Circulation. 96 1997:3294-3299.
CrossRef | PubMed
Pfeffer  M.A., Braunwald  E.; Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 8 1990:1161-1172.
CrossRef
Gorman  J.H.  III, Gorman  R.C., Plappert  T.; Infarct size and location determine development of mitral regurgitation in the sheep model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 115 1998:615-622.
CrossRef | PubMed
Gillinov  A.M., Wierup  P.N., Blackstone  E.H.; Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 122 2001:1125-1141.
CrossRef | PubMed
Kumanohoso  T., Otsuji  Y., Yoshifuku  S.; Mechanism of higher incidence of ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with inferior myocardial infarction. quantitative analysis of left ventricular and mitral valve geometry in 103 patients with prior myocardial infarction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 125 2003:135-143.
CrossRef | PubMed
Lamas  G.A., Mitchell  G.F., Flaker  G.C.; Clinical significance of mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 96 1997:827-833.
CrossRef | PubMed
Grossi  E.A., Goldberg  J.D., LaPietra  A.; Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement. comparison of long-term survival and complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 122 2000:1107-1124.
CrossRef
Miller  D.C.; Ischemic mitral regurgitation redux—to repair or to replace?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 122 2001:1059-1062.
CrossRef | PubMed
Bolognese  L., Neskovic  A.N., Parodi  G.; Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty. patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications. Circulation. 106 2002:2351-2357.
CrossRef | PubMed
Jackson  B.M., Gorman  J.H.  III, St. John-Sutton  M.G.; Progressive borderzone extension leads to heart failure after anteroapical myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 40 2002:1160-1167.
CrossRef | PubMed
Narula  J., Dawson  M.S., Singh  B.K.; Noninvasive characterization of stunned, hibernating, remodeled and nonviable myocardium in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 36 2000:1913-1918.
CrossRef | PubMed
Llaneras  M.R., Nance  M.L., Streicher  J.T.; Large animal model of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 57 1994:432-439.
CrossRef | PubMed
Kelley  S.T., Malekan  R., Jackson  B.M.; Restraining infarct expansion preserves left ventricular geometry and function after acute anteroapical infarction. Circulation. 99 1999:135-142.
CrossRef | PubMed
Moainie  S.L., Gorman  J.H.  III, Guy  T.S.; An ovine model of postinfarction dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg. 74 2002:753-760.
CrossRef | PubMed
Schiller  N.B., Shah  P.M., Crawford  M.; Recommendation for the quantification of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 5 1989:358-362.
Miyatake  K., Izumi  S., Okamoto  M.; Semiquantitative grading of severity of mitral regurgitation by real-time two-dimensional Doppler flow imaging technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 7 1986:82-88.
CrossRef | PubMed
Akins  C.W., Hilgenberg  A.D., Buckley  M.J.; Mitral valve reconstruction versus replacement for degenerative or ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 58 1994:668-675.
CrossRef | PubMed
Guccione  J.M., Moonly  S.M., Moustakidis  P.; Mechanism underlying mechanical dysfunction in the border zone of left ventricular aneurysm. a finite element model study. Ann Thorac Surg. 71 2001:654-662.
CrossRef | PubMed
Wilson  E.M., Moainie  S.L., Baskin  J.M.; Region and species specific induction of matrix metalloproteinases occurs with post-myocardial infarction remodeling. Circulation. 107 2003:2857-2863.
CrossRef | PubMed
Couper  G.S., Bunton  R.W., Birjiniuk  V.; Relative risks of left ventricular aneurysmectomy in patients with akinetic scars versus true dyskinetic aneurysms. Circulation. 82 (Suppl IV) 1990:IV248-256.
PubMed
Batista  R.J.V., Verde  J., Nery  P.; Partial left ventriculectomy to treat end-stage heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 64 1997:634-638.
CrossRef | PubMed
Athanasuleas  C.L., Stanley  A.W.  Jr, Buckberg  G.D.; Surgical anterior ventricular endocardial restoration (SAVER) in the dilated remodeled ventricle after anterior myocardial infarction. RESTORE group. Reconstructive Endoventricular Surgery, Returning Torsion Original Radius Elliptical Shape to the LV. J Am Coll Cardiol. 37 2001:1199-1209.
CrossRef | PubMed
Jackson  B.M., Gorman  J.H.  III, Salgo  I.S.; Increased wall stress due to altered borderzone geometry as assessed by perfusion echocardiography. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 284 2003:H475-479.
PubMed
Levy  D., Kenchaiah  S., Larson  M.G.; Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 347 2002:1397-1402.
CrossRef | PubMed
Moainie  S.L., Guy  T.S., Gorman  J.H.  III; Infarct restraint attenuates remodeling and reduces chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation after postero-lateral infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 74 2002:444-449.
CrossRef | PubMed

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Degree of mitral regurgitation (MR) graded on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = no MR, 4 = severe MR) in control group (squares), annuloplasty group (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). By the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test with MR as the dependent variable and considering all experimental time points, the wrap, annuloplasty, and control groups are all significantly different (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Normalized left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) in control group (squares), annuloplasty group (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). The LVESV increased significantly in the control and annuloplasty groups at eight weeks but not in the wrap group. By analysis of variance, considering all experimental time points, the wrap group was significantly different from both the annuloplasty and the control groups. The annuloplasty group was not significantly different from the controls.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

End-systolic muscle-to-cavity-area ratio (ESMCAR) in control group (squares), annuloplasty group (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). The ESMCAR did not change during postinfarction remodeling in the wrap group. By analysis of variance, considering all experimental time points, ESMCAR was significantly reduced in both the annuloplasty and control groups when compared with the wrap group. There was no significant difference between the control and annuloplasty groups.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Length of the circumferential wall motion abnormality at the high papillary muscle level (WMA) in control group (squares), annuloplasty group (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). By analysis of variance, considering all experimental time points, the WMA was significantly greater in the annuloplasty and control groups when compared to the wrap group. There was no statistical difference between the control and annuloplasty groups.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Ejection fraction (EF) in control group (squares), annuloplasty (circles), and ventricular wrap group (triangles). By analysis of variance, considering all experimental time points, the EF in the annuloplasty group was significantly less than both the wrap and control groups. There was no statistical difference between the control and wrap groups.

Tables

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 1Hemodynamic Data
Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 2Echocardiography Data
Table Footer Note*p < 0.05 compared to preinfarction within group.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared to control group.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared to annuloplasty group. All results expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean.

Interactive Graphics

Video

References

St. John-Sutton  M., Pfeffer  M.A., Moye  L.; Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction. baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial. Circulation. 96 1997:3294-3299.
CrossRef | PubMed
Pfeffer  M.A., Braunwald  E.; Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 8 1990:1161-1172.
CrossRef
Gorman  J.H.  III, Gorman  R.C., Plappert  T.; Infarct size and location determine development of mitral regurgitation in the sheep model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 115 1998:615-622.
CrossRef | PubMed
Gillinov  A.M., Wierup  P.N., Blackstone  E.H.; Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 122 2001:1125-1141.
CrossRef | PubMed
Kumanohoso  T., Otsuji  Y., Yoshifuku  S.; Mechanism of higher incidence of ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with inferior myocardial infarction. quantitative analysis of left ventricular and mitral valve geometry in 103 patients with prior myocardial infarction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 125 2003:135-143.
CrossRef | PubMed
Lamas  G.A., Mitchell  G.F., Flaker  G.C.; Clinical significance of mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 96 1997:827-833.
CrossRef | PubMed
Grossi  E.A., Goldberg  J.D., LaPietra  A.; Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement. comparison of long-term survival and complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 122 2000:1107-1124.
CrossRef
Miller  D.C.; Ischemic mitral regurgitation redux—to repair or to replace?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 122 2001:1059-1062.
CrossRef | PubMed
Bolognese  L., Neskovic  A.N., Parodi  G.; Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty. patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications. Circulation. 106 2002:2351-2357.
CrossRef | PubMed
Jackson  B.M., Gorman  J.H.  III, St. John-Sutton  M.G.; Progressive borderzone extension leads to heart failure after anteroapical myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 40 2002:1160-1167.
CrossRef | PubMed
Narula  J., Dawson  M.S., Singh  B.K.; Noninvasive characterization of stunned, hibernating, remodeled and nonviable myocardium in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 36 2000:1913-1918.
CrossRef | PubMed
Llaneras  M.R., Nance  M.L., Streicher  J.T.; Large animal model of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 57 1994:432-439.
CrossRef | PubMed
Kelley  S.T., Malekan  R., Jackson  B.M.; Restraining infarct expansion preserves left ventricular geometry and function after acute anteroapical infarction. Circulation. 99 1999:135-142.
CrossRef | PubMed
Moainie  S.L., Gorman  J.H.  III, Guy  T.S.; An ovine model of postinfarction dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg. 74 2002:753-760.
CrossRef | PubMed
Schiller  N.B., Shah  P.M., Crawford  M.; Recommendation for the quantification of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 5 1989:358-362.
Miyatake  K., Izumi  S., Okamoto  M.; Semiquantitative grading of severity of mitral regurgitation by real-time two-dimensional Doppler flow imaging technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 7 1986:82-88.
CrossRef | PubMed
Akins  C.W., Hilgenberg  A.D., Buckley  M.J.; Mitral valve reconstruction versus replacement for degenerative or ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 58 1994:668-675.
CrossRef | PubMed
Guccione  J.M., Moonly  S.M., Moustakidis  P.; Mechanism underlying mechanical dysfunction in the border zone of left ventricular aneurysm. a finite element model study. Ann Thorac Surg. 71 2001:654-662.
CrossRef | PubMed
Wilson  E.M., Moainie  S.L., Baskin  J.M.; Region and species specific induction of matrix metalloproteinases occurs with post-myocardial infarction remodeling. Circulation. 107 2003:2857-2863.
CrossRef | PubMed
Couper  G.S., Bunton  R.W., Birjiniuk  V.; Relative risks of left ventricular aneurysmectomy in patients with akinetic scars versus true dyskinetic aneurysms. Circulation. 82 (Suppl IV) 1990:IV248-256.
PubMed
Batista  R.J.V., Verde  J., Nery  P.; Partial left ventriculectomy to treat end-stage heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 64 1997:634-638.
CrossRef | PubMed
Athanasuleas  C.L., Stanley  A.W.  Jr, Buckberg  G.D.; Surgical anterior ventricular endocardial restoration (SAVER) in the dilated remodeled ventricle after anterior myocardial infarction. RESTORE group. Reconstructive Endoventricular Surgery, Returning Torsion Original Radius Elliptical Shape to the LV. J Am Coll Cardiol. 37 2001:1199-1209.
CrossRef | PubMed
Jackson  B.M., Gorman  J.H.  III, Salgo  I.S.; Increased wall stress due to altered borderzone geometry as assessed by perfusion echocardiography. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 284 2003:H475-479.
PubMed
Levy  D., Kenchaiah  S., Larson  M.G.; Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 347 2002:1397-1402.
CrossRef | PubMed
Moainie  S.L., Guy  T.S., Gorman  J.H.  III; Infarct restraint attenuates remodeling and reduces chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation after postero-lateral infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 74 2002:444-449.
CrossRef | PubMed

Correspondence

Latest JACC CME

Continuing Medical Education through JACC is a convenient way to fulfill your CME requirements while learning important information about the latest advances in cardiovascular medicine.

April 2013- JACC CME Activity
Repeat Revascularization and Outcome

March 2013- JACC CME Activity
Extreme Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Improved Cardiovascular Risk Prediction

Feb 2013- JACC CME Activity
Results from the BARI 2D Trial

Jan 2013- JACC CME Activity
Prognosis Among Healthy Individuals Discharged With a Primary Diagnosis of Syncope

Dec 2012- JACC CME Activity
Incidence of Heart Failure or Cardiomyopathy After Adjuvant Trastuzumab Therapy for Breast Cancer

Nov 2012- JACC CME Activity
A Collaborative Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 10 Randomized Trials

Oct 2012- JACC CME Activity
Radiofrequency Ablation of Premature Ventricular Ectopy Improves the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Nonresponders

Sept 2012- JACC CME Activity
Exercise and Pharmacological Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

Aug 2012- JACC CME Activity
Reduction in Life-Threatening Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Statin-Treated Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Enrolled in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)

July 2012- JACC CME Activity
Relationship of Beta-Blocker Dose With Outcomes in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients With Systolic Dysfunction

For previous CME quizzes, please follow this link to CardioSource Lifelong Learning and MOC.

 

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles