0
Back To Top Jump Location
Sign In  | Cart
Left Shadow
Right Shadow
Pre-Clinical Research |

Human Cardiac Progenitor Cells Engineered With Pim-I Kinase Enhance Myocardial Repair

Sadia Mohsin, PhD; Mohsin Khan, PhD; Haruhiro Toko, MD, PhD; Brandi Bailey, PhD; Christopher T. Cottage, MS; Kathleen Wallach, BS; Divya Nag; Andrew Lee, BS; Sailay Siddiqi, MD; Feng Lan, PhD; Kimberlee M. Fischer, PhD; Natalie Gude, PhD; Pearl Quijada, MS; Daniele Avitabile, PhD; Silvia Truffa, BS; Brett Collins, BS; Walter Dembitsky, MD; Joseph C. Wu, MD, PhD; Mark A. Sussman, PhD
[+] Author Information

Dr. Sussman was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R21HL102714, R01HL067245, R37HL091102, P01HL085577, RC1HL100891, R21HL102613, R21HL104544, RO1 HL113656, and R01HL105759. Dr. Wu was supported by National Institutes of Health grants RC1HL100891 and R01EB009689. Dr. Dembitsky is a lecturer and has received grant support from Thoratec. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Mark A. Sussman, SDSU Heart Institute and Department of Biology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, California 92182

Copyright 2012, American College of Cardiology Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(14):1278-1287. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.047
Published online

Objectives  The goal of this study was to demonstrate the enhancement of human cardiac progenitor cell (hCPC) reparative and regenerative potential by genetic modification for the treatment of myocardial infarction.

Background  Regenerative potential of stem cells to repair acute infarction is limited. Improved hCPC survival, proliferation, and differentiation into functional myocardium will increase efficacy and advance translational implementation of cardiac regeneration.

Methods  hCPCs isolated from the myocardium of heart failure patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation were engineered to express green fluorescent protein (hCPCe) or Pim-1-GFP (hCPCeP). Functional tests of hCPC regenerative potential were performed with immunocompromised mice by using intramyocardial adoptive transfer injection after infarction. Myocardial structure and function were monitored by echocardiographic and hemodynamic assessment for 20 weeks after delivery. hCPCe and hCPCeP expressing luciferase were observed by using bioluminescence imaging to noninvasively track persistence.

Results  hCPCeP exhibited augmentation of reparative potential relative to hCPCe control cells, as shown by significantly increased proliferation coupled with amelioration of infarction injury and increased hemodynamic performance at 20 weeks post-transplantation. Concurrent with enhanced cardiac structure and function, hCPCeP demonstrated increased cellular engraftment and differentiation with improved vasculature and reduced infarct size. Enhanced persistence of hCPCeP versus hCPCe was revealed by bioluminescence imaging at up to 8 weeks post-delivery.

Conclusions  Genetic engineering of hCPCs with Pim-1 enhanced repair of damaged myocardium. Ex vivo gene delivery to modify stem cells has emerged as a viable option addressing current limitations in the field. This study demonstrates that efficacy of hCPCs from the failing myocardium can be safely and significantly enhanced through expression of Pim-1 kinase, setting the stage for use of engineered cells in pre-clinical settings.

Figures in this Article

The human heart harbors an adult stem cell population consistent with true characteristics of stemness such as self-renewal (1), clonogenicity (2), and multilineage differentiation potential (3). These “cardiac stem cells” populate the heart in highly conserved atrial and ventricular niches that regulate myocyte turnover (4). Recent evidence demonstrates the ability of resident human cardiac cells to differentiate into mechanically integrated cardiomyocytes ((3),5) as well as vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells, thereby supporting cardiac regeneration (6). Adoptive transfer of human cardiac stem cells results in modest repair due in part to lack of survival, proliferation, and commitment of the transplanted cells after myocardial infarction. Therapeutic stem cell performance is further complicated by the elderly target population for regenerative therapy, which possesses a stem cell pool adversely affected by age concomitant with up-regulation of senescence markers (4), shorter telomere length (3), and decreased metabolic activity (7). These detrimental insults collectively compromise the regenerative ability of stem cells in this aged population, limiting their use for autologous therapy.

Modification of human cardiac progenitor cells (hCPCs) to enhance proliferation, survival, and commitment increases effectiveness and buttresses use of stem cells as a viable therapeutic modality. Ex vivo genetic modification is an effective strategy to enhance stem cell function ((8),9). Previously, our group has shown that Pim-1 kinase, a downstream effector of Akt, enhances cell survival (10) and metabolic activity (11), attenuates apoptosis (12), and maintains mitochondrial integrity ((11),13). Mechanistically, apoptotic proteins such as Bad (14) and cell cycle proteins including p21 (15) have been identified as Pim-1 substrates. In the heart, Pim-1 is induced as a consequence of stress or pathological insult (10). Pim-1 also positively regulates neovasculogenesis (16), which forms an integral part of the myocardial repair response. Proof-of-principle studies performed with murine CPCs in a syngeneic system demonstrate that Pim-1 augments reparative processes after myocardial injury, with improved cellular survival, persistence, and differentiation of engrafted cells into cardiac lineages 32 weeks after transplantation (17). However, potentiation of hCPCs derived from patients who have heart failure presents a different challenge from the healthy young CPCs used in syngeneic murine studies. Utility of hCPCs as a viable therapeutic option would be further improved by interventional strategies designed to overcome inherent limitations in aged or pathologically challenged myocardial tissue.

Applicability of genetic modification to the clinical setting requires progression into an experimental model with hCPCs obtained from the target population of aged patients who would be candidates for regenerative therapy: individuals undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to transplant or destination therapy. In the present study, we demonstrate that hCPCs isolated from failing myocardium and modified with Pim-1 possess enhanced reparative potential relative to control hCPCs. Improvements mediated by hCPCs modified with Pim-1 were evident structurally and functionally, with durable human cellular persistence, engraftment, and acquisition of phenotypic characteristics consistent with differentiated myocardium. These results validate the utility of Pim-1 kinase as a molecular interventional approach to enhance hCPC-mediated regeneration, even when derived from a failing human heart.

See the Online Appendix for an explanation of the study methods.

Pim-1 overexpression characterization in hCPCs

hCPCs are negative for hematopoietic markers CD34, CD45, CD2, CD16, and CD31 and are positive for c-kit ((5) and 5). Human cardiac progenitor cells overexpressing green fluorescent protein (hCPCe) and human cardiac progenitor cells overexpressing Pim-1 (hCPCeP) were transduced with lentiviral vectors Lv-egfp and Lv-egfp+pim1 (5). Efficiency of modification after lentiviral transduction was 74.25% and 75.95% for hCPCe and hCPCeP, respectively, as measured by using flow cytometric analyses for enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) (5). Expression of eGFP and Pim-1 in hCPCe and hCPCeP was confirmed by using immunoblot analysis (5). Karyotype analyses revealed normal chromosome content in either hCPCe or hCPCeP, indicating normal mitotic chromosomal segregation in the genetically engineered cells (5).

Enhanced proliferation, mitochondrial activity, and TRAPactivity in hCPCeP

Proliferation was increased in hCPCeP relative to hCPCs and hCPCe (p < 0.001) at day 3 as measured by using CyQUANT assay (Figure 47_gr1A). Conversely, using the Pim-1 pharmacological blocker quercetagetin, proliferation was abrogated at day 1 (p < 0.01) and day 3 (p < 0.001), demonstrating involvement of Pim-1 in the proliferative response (Figure 47_gr1B). hCPCeP also showed increased metabolic activity compared with hCPCs and hCPCe at day 3 (p < 0.001), as measured by using MTT assay (Figure 47_gr1C). Similarly, relative telomerase reverse transcriptase activity measured by using a TRAP assay was significantly improved (p < 0.05) in hCPCeP compared with hCPCe (Figure 47_gr1D). Increased levels of phospho-p21, a Pim-1 target substrate, confirm functional activity of expressed Pim-1 protein by using immunoblot analysis ((Figure 47_gr1)E and Figure 47_gr1F). Collectively, these results indicate that Pim-1 modification of hCPC confers phenotypic properties consistent with beneficial cellular signaling.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Enhancement of Proliferation, Mitochondrial Activity, and Telomerase Activity in hCPCeP

(A) CyQUANT assay: human cardiac progenitor cells overexpressing Pim-1 (hCPCeP) exhibited enhanced proliferation compared with human cardiac progenitor cells (hCPCs) and human cardiac progenitor cells overexpressing green fluorescent protein (hCPCe) for 3 days (n = 4). (B) CyQUANT assay: hCPCeP treated with 10 μM of quercetagetin show decreased proliferation relative to nontreated hCPCeP (n = 4). (C) Metabolic activity measured by using MTT reagent: hCPCeP demonstrated improved metabolic activity relative to hCPC and hCPCe (n = 4). (D) Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) activity is significantly higher in hCPCeP relative to hCPCe (n = 3). (E) Immunoblot analysis for p21 and p-p21. (F) Quantitation of immunoblot (n = 3). *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.05.

Increased cardiac commitment of hCPCeP after dexamethasone differentiation

Markers of cardiogenic lineage commitment, including MEF2C, von Willebrand factor (vWF), and GATA-6, were up-regulated in hCPCeP relative to hCPCe after dexamethasone (Dex) treatment, as confirmed by using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis (Figure 47_gr2A) and immunocytochemistry (Figure 47_gr2B). MEF2C and GATA-6 signal were absent in hCPCe or hCPCeP before Dex treatment, with sparse reactivity for vWF in hCPCeP (Figure 47_gr2B) and marked increases in immunolabeling for all 3 markers as well as morphological remodeling of hCPCe and hCPCeP after Dex exposure (Figure 47_gr2C). Morphological remodeling (flattening) of cells treated with Dex was consistent with previous findings ((17),(18),19). These results indicate augmentation of lineage commitment signals in hCPCeP relative to control hCPCe after rudimentary differentiation induction with Dex.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Increases in Cardiac Commitment of hCPCeP After Dex Differentiation

(A) Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis for hCPCe and hCPCeP after dexamethasone (Dex) treatment for MEF2C, GATA-6, and von Willebrand factor (vWF) (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.01, hCPCeP-Dex versus hCPCeP+Dex; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, hCPCe+Dex versus hCPCeP+Dex. (B, C) Immunostaining for MEF2C (cardiac), vWF (endothelial), and GATA-6 (smooth muscle) before and after Dex treatment for 7 days. GFP = green fluorescent protein; other abbreviations as in (Figure 1).

hCPCeP augment cardiac function and reduce infarct size

Delivery of hCPCeP, hCPCe, or vehicle alone by intramyocardial injection into SCID mice concurrent with myocardial infarction was performed to determine reparative potential. Loss of function in all groups indicated comparability of infarction damage as assessed at 1 week post-challenge by using echocardiography ((Figure 47_gr3)A and Figure 47_gr3B). Within 4 weeks after cell injection, myocardial function was significantly improved (p < 0.001) (5) in hearts of mice receiving either hCPCe or hCPCeP compared with vehicle, as measured via echocardiographic assessment of ejection fraction (EF) or fractional shortening (FS) ((Figure 47_gr3)A and Figure 47_gr3B). Differences in myocardial function between hCPCe and hCPCeP 4 weeks after transplantation were not significant (p > 0.05) (5). However, EF and FS performance improved in the hCPCeP group from 4 to 8 weeks post-delivery, in contrast with depressed contractility for hCPCe-treated mice that was not significantly different (p > 0.05) from the vehicle group ((Figure 47_gr3)A and Figure 47_gr3B). Myocardial contractile performance of hearts receiving hCPCeP increased by 1.81-fold in EF and 1.86-fold in FS compared with hCPCe 20 weeks after transplantation. Hemodynamic parameters were also significantly improved in hCPCeP-treated hearts compared with those treated with hCPCe (p < 0.01) or vehicle (p < 0.001) 20 weeks after transplantation. hCPCeP-treated hearts increased dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin (maximum and minimum rate of pressure change in the ventricle) by 1.29-fold and 1.23-fold, respectively (Figure 47_gr3C) together with a 1.37-fold increase in left ventricular developed pressure (Figure 47_gr3D) relative to hCPCe. Collectively, these results demonstrate the enhanced capacity of hCPCeP to preserve and/or restore myocardial function after infarction injury.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Improvement of Cardiac Performance of Mice Treated With hCPCeP 20 Weeks After Transplantation in SCID Mice

(A, B) Percentage of fractional shortening (FS) and ejection fraction (EF) measured by using echocardiography; sham: n = 6; vehicle: n = 12; hCPCe: n = 16; and hCPCeP: n = 16. (C) Hemodynamic assessment of rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt ) after cell transplantation (sham: n = 3; vehicle: n = 5; hCPCe: n = 5; and hCPCeP: n = 5). (D) Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.01, for vehicle versus hCPCeP; ϕp < 0.05, ϕϕp < 0.001, ϕϕϕp < 0.01, for hCPCe versus hCPCeP; #p < 0.01, ##p < 0.001, ###p < 0.05, for vehicle versus hCPCe. Abbreviations as in (Figure 1).

Enhancement of myocyte formation and neovascularization resulting from hCPCeP delivery

Improvement of hemodynamic performance in hearts receiving hCPCeP (Figure 47_gr3) was accompanied by evidence of cardiogenic lineage commitment. Cardiomyocyte immunoreactivity with alpha-sarcomeric actin labeling in hearts receiving hCPCeP demonstrated cardiogenic commitment, together with a coincident eGFP signal indicative of derivation from hCPCeP. Human origin of cells in myocardial sections from mice was evident by immunolabeling for eGFP co-localized with human-specific mitochondrial marker or by detection of characteristic repetitive Alu DNA sequence (5). hCPCeP displayed a significant 2.32-fold increase (p < 0.05) in telomere length after adoptive transfer to infarcted hearts relative to hCPCe 20 weeks after transplantation, consistent with a youthful cellular phenotype ((Figure 47_gr4)A to Figure 47_gr4C). Infarction size was significantly smaller at 20 weeks in hCPCeP-transplanted mice compared with hCPCe-transplanted mice. Infarction damage involving 61.3% of the left ventricular free wall in hearts receiving hCPCeP compared favorably with 84.3% in hearts receiving hCPCe (p < 0.05). Infarct size was not significantly different in hearts receiving either vehicle or hCPCe ((Figure 47_gr4)D and Figure 47_gr4E). Presence of c-kit+/GFP+ cells derived from the adoptively transferred population increased 4.0-fold in hearts receiving hCPCeP relative to hCPCe 12 weeks after delivery. Total c-kit+ cell number was significantly higher by 1.75-fold (p < 0.05) in heart sections from hCPCeP relative to hearts receiving hCPCe at 12 weeks ((Figure 47_gr4)F to Figure 47_gr4I). New myocyte formation in these hearts was identified according to eGFP signal together with alpha-sarcomeric actin staining 12 weeks after transplantation (Figure 47_gr5A). New vessel formation was evident by coincidence of eGFP immunolabeling with smooth muscle actin (SM22) to label vascular walls as well as vWF to label endothelial vessel lining ((Figure 47_gr5)B to Figure 47_gr5C). Myocardial sections from hearts receiving hCPCeP exhibited 28% GFP+/SM22+ cells versus 17% in hCPCe (Figure 47_gr5D). Similarly, hCPCeP-treated hearts possessed 22% GFP+/vWF+ cells compared with 12% in hCPCe. Expression of Pim-1 was maintained for at least 12 weeks after delivery with increased immunolabeling for Pim-1 (5). Collectively, these results suggest the enhanced ability of hCPCeP to survive and proliferate, significantly augmenting angiogenesis and myogenesis in the infarcted heart.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

hCPCeP Show Increases in Telomere Length, Enhancement of c-kit–Positive Cell Number, and Decreases in Fibrosis

(A) Remote and (B) infarct zone telomere length in mice treated with hCPCeP, telomere (white), GFP (green), desmin (red), and nuclei (blue). (C) Quantitation of telomere length of hCPCe and hCPCeP (p < 0.05). (D) Masson's trichrome staining for vehicle-, hCPCe-, and hCPCeP-injected SCID mice. (E) Percentage of infarcted left ventricular free wall (LVFW) in vehicle, hCPCe, and hCPCeP (n = 3), p < 0.01. (F, G) Immunostaining for c-kit (white), GFP (green), alpha-sarcomeric actin (red), and nuclei 24 (blue) in hCPCe and hCPCeP, respectively. (H) Quantitation of total number of c-kit+ cells/mm2 in vehicle, hCPCe, and hCPCeP. (I) Quantitation of GFP+ and c-kit+ cells/mm2 in hCPCe- and hCPCeP-treated animals (n = 3). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Abbreviations as in Figures (Figure 1) and (Figure 2).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

hCPCeP Augment Myocardial Repair 12 Weeks After Transplantation

Immunolabeling for (A) GFP (green), alpha-sarcomeric actin (red), and nuclei (blue). (B) SM22 (white), GFP (green), alpha-sarcomeric actin (red), and nuclei (blue). (C) vW (white), GFP (green), alpha-sarcomeric actin (red), and nuclei (blue). (D) Quantitation of SM22, vWF and alpha-sarcomeric actin in hCPCe and hCPCeP (p < 0.001). Boxes indicate enlarged areas. Scale bars = 150 μm for all panels except row A, where hCPCe and hCPCeP widefield images = 50 μm and insets = 25 μm. Abbreviations as in Figures (Figure 1), (Figure 2), and (Figure 4).

Persistence of hCPCeP after delivery confers long-term hemodynamic performance improvement revealed by noninvasive imaging

hCPC persistence in vivo was longitudinally assessed over an 8-week period by using bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of luciferase (Luc) signal in hearts receiving either hCPCe or hCPCeP transduced with Luc reporter construct (Figure 47_gr6A) immediately after infarction injury. Both hCPCe-Luc or hCPCeP-Luc produced a robust BLI signal at day 2 in all recipient animals, indicative of successful cell delivery to the heart. The BLI signal remained detectable in the hCPCeP-Luc cohort throughout 56 days post-delivery ((Figure 47_gr6)B and Figure 47_gr6C), in stark contrast to loss of signal by 14 days after delivery in the hCPCe-Luc group. These results suggest the superior persistence of hCPCeP-Luc after delivery, particularly in the critical window of 2 to 4 weeks post-infarction.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Enhancement of hCPCeP Persistence

(A) Firefly luciferase (Luc) reporter construct. (B) Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) imaging: pseudocolor images representing signal intensity in mice treated with hCPCe-Luc (top) and hCPCeP-Luc (bottom) after myocardial infarction. hCPCe-Luc signal was not detected 7 days after transplantation whereas hCPCeP-luc shows signal throughout the experimental cohort for 56 days. (C) Quantitation of pseudocolor images represented in maximum radiance (p/s/cm2/sr). Abbreviations as in (Figure 1).

Myocardial contractile performance impairment was initially comparable shortly after cardiomyopathic challenge in cohorts of hCPCe-Luc or hCPCeP-Luc, indicative of similar infarction injury according to echocardiographic assessment. Subsequently, mice receiving hCPCeP-Luc exhibited improvement in FS, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension, and anterior wall thickness at 8 weeks post-injury ((Figure 47_gr7)A to (Figure 47_gr7)D) (p < 0.05). Magnetic resonance imaging at 1 and 8 weeks post-infarction substantiated the echocardiographic results, revealing improved hemodynamic parameters at 8 weeks in mice receiving hCPCeP-Luc compared with hCPCe-Luc ((Figure 47_gr7)E to Figure 47_gr7H) with respect to left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-systolic volume, and EF (p < 0.05). P values for all parameters by magnetic resonance imaging or echocardiography are provided (5). hCPCeP-Luc–treated hearts exhibited a 22.5% increase in anterior wall dimension with a 10% decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and a 20.6% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic dimension by echocardiography 8 weeks after transplantation relative to hCPCe-Luc.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Echocardiography and MRI of Mice 8 Weeks After Myocardial Infarction

(A) Echocardiographic images from hCPCe-Luc and hCPCeP- Luc, (B) left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd), (C) left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESd), and (D) anterior wall (AW) thickness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): (E) MRI images, (F) left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), (G) ejection fraction percentage (EF%), and (H) left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). *p < 0.05 versus hCPCe. Abbreviations as in (Figure 1).

Discovery of hCPCs contributing to cardiomyogenesis within the heart and supporting myocardial repair has revolutionized the conceptual view of treatment for heart disease, as supported by the capacity of hCPCs to form functionally integrated cardiomyocytes and vasculature (20). However, survival and persistence of adoptively transferred hCPCs used for therapeutic purposes remain a major concern, particularly when the donor cell population used for autologous therapy is derived from pathologically stressed myocardium. Regenerative capabilities of adult hCPCs are likely to be impaired by age (21) and disease (22), limiting the reparative and regenerative potential of these autologously derived cells. Ex vivo modification or pre-conditioning has been shown to prime adoptively transferred cells for myocardial repair ((23),24). Genetic modification to augment cellular survival and proliferation is a viable molecular interventional strategy, as previously published by our group, for syngeneic murine CPCs ((17),25). The present study addresses a critical issue by demonstrating that Pim-1 modification augments regenerative and reparative potential of hCPC derived from heart failure patients, bringing this conceptual approach another step closer to therapeutic implementation.

hCPC isolated from heart failure patients amenable to modification with Pim-1 also display phenotypic characteristics consistent with enhanced survival, proliferation, and reversal of senescent characteristics. hCPCeP exhibit high proliferation and metabolic activity in vitro ((Figure 47_gr1)A to Figure 47_gr1C). Telomere lengths of hCPCeP are also preserved, suggesting an important role of Pim-1 in maintaining telomere length (Figure 47_gr1D) to antagonize cellular senescence; this topic is currently being investigated by our group. Pim-1 also increases phosphorylation of p21 ((Figure 47_gr1)E and Figure 47_gr1F), a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, as well as stabilizing c-Myc and the nuclear mitotic apparatus (26). Increased survival of Pim-1–engineered cells is likely due to the ability of the kinase to promote proliferation and attenuate apoptotic signaling ((10),27), moderating enhanced proliferation and persistence of the transplanted cells to augment the reparative process.

Potentiation of hCPCs from heart failure patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation reported in our study addresses the heretofore critical unanswered issue of whether aged hCPCs from pathologically damaged myocardium would retain the capacity to benefit from genetic engineering. Indeed, heart failure associated with aging has been proposed to be a “stem cell disease” characterized by impaired functional reserve of the endogenous stem cell pool due to exhaustion, senescence, depletion, or inability to cope with the environmental stressors (28). Recent clinical results using autologous hCPCs to restore myocardial performance in the SCIPIO (Cardiac Stem Cell Infusion in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy) trial found that the c-kit+ cell population is capable of mediating improvement in both EF as well as reduction in infarct size (29). With unequivocal evidence of clinical relevance for the treatment of heart failure using c-kit+ hCPC, the future of hCPC therapy will inevitably turn toward assessment of approaches to enhance the regenerative process.

Can Pim-1 be considered an appropriate molecular interventional strategy for enhancing cardiogenesis? Pim-1 induces proliferation of endothelial (16) and vascular smooth muscle (30) cells as well as promoting lineage commitment as evidenced by increased expression of cardiogenic transcripts in Pim-1–engineered CPCs (17) (Figure 47_gr2). hCPCeP express vWF transcript before and after differentiation in vitro and after transplantation into damaged myocardium. Moreover, clear evidence of myocytes derived from adoptively transferred hCPCeP was revealed after 20 weeks post-delivery by using immunohistochemistry ((Figure 47_gr5), 5). Persistence, expansion, and integration of the hCPCeP into myocardial tissue translate into progressive improvement in myocardial structure and function evident up to 20 weeks post-delivery relative to hCPCe (Figs. (Figure 47_gr3) and Figure 47_gr6). The durability of repair, together with the superior improvement of functional parameters of myocardial hemodynamic performance, supports the use of Pim-1 as a plausible molecular strategy to enhance myocardial regeneration with modified hCPCs.

Despite pro-proliferative effects mediated by Pim-1, oncogenic transformation has never been observed in any of our human samples, and all engineered hCPCeP were amenable to differentiation in vitro that resulted in acquisition of post-mitotic characteristics (Figure 47_gr2). In vivo studies show cardiogenic commitment of hCPCeP to all 3 essential cell lineages for reconstitution of myocardial tissue: cardiomyocytes, vasculature, and endothelium (Figure 47_gr5). Furthermore, karyotypic analyses show normal chromosome content in hCPCeP (5). Although oncogenic risk needs to be carefully evaluated when genetic engineering is proposed, it is important to consider that lentiviral vectors have also made their way into clinics as therapies (31), including for advanced forms of HIV infections (32), Parkinson's disease (33), and inherited disorders affecting hematopoietic cells (34). In addition, lentiviral vectors have integration sites away from transcriptional regulatory sites, making them a safe therapeutic option (35). These findings are in stark contrast to published literature showing chromosomal abnormalities in certain embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells in which oncogenic transformation remains a significant barrier to therapeutic implementation ((36),37).

Clinical trials using bone marrow–derived stem cells (TAC-HFT [Transendocardial Injection of Autologous Human Cells (bone marrow or mesenchymal) in Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure Secondary to Myocardial Infarction]) (38) and hCPCs (29) effectively demonstrate improved cardiac function after transplantation of stem cells. Narrow inclusion criteria for these clinical trials leave open the issue as to whether initially promising findings will be broadly applicable to the much greater segment of patients experiencing the debilitating consequences of aging and multiple concurrent cardiac problems. Nevertheless, despite severe deterioration of myocardium necessitating surgical intervention and mechanical assist device implantation in the 68-year-old source of our hCPC, Pim-1 expression effectively increased myocardial repair in immunosuppressed murine recipients, whereas hCPCe without Pim-1 expression were ineffective. Persistence of the BLI signal of hCPCeP until ∼2 months after delivery (Figure 47_gr6) reinforces the earlier findings with syngeneic CPCeP in mice (17) and supports the notion that hCPCeP become permanently integrated into the myocardium, unlike control hCPCe undetectable after 2 weeks post-delivery. Moreover, the notably enhanced signal from hCPCeP at 2 to 4 weeks after transfer coincides with timing for recruitment of endogenous repair in the infarcted heart (25). Increased presence of total c-kit+ cells in the myocardium of hearts receiving hCPCeP ((Figure 47_gr4)F to Figure 47_gr4I) likely reflects augmentation of endogenous repair previously postulated to play a critical role in mediating myocardial repair (39). The ensuing progressive loss of BLI signal in hearts of recipient mice receiving hCPCeP over 2 months could be caused by ongoing molecular and cellular processes such as promoter silencing ((29),40) or rejection of the allogenic human cells from remnants of non–T cell, non–B cell immunity in the NOD/SCID mice (41). It is reasonable to posit that persistence of hCPCeP could be further improved with autologous transfer as well as by using humanized expression vectors such as minicircles that can persist for months in nondividing cells without integrating into chromatin, thereby minimizing concerns of insertional mutagenesis (42). Ongoing studies are evaluating minicircle technology and other protocol modifications to further refine the safety and efficacy of Pim-1 genetic engineering to enhance myocardial regeneration.

Bearzi  C., Rota  M., Hosoda  T.; Human cardiac stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:14068-14073.
CrossRef | PubMed
Hosoda  T., D'Amario  D., Cabral-Da-Silva  M.C.; Clonality of mouse and human cardiomyogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17169-17174.
CrossRef | PubMed
Cesselli  D., Beltrami  A.P., D'Aurizio  F.; Effects of age and heart failure on human cardiac stem cell function. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:349-366.
CrossRef | PubMed
Kajstura  J., Gurusamy  N., Ogorek  B.; Myocyte turnover in the aging human heart. Circ Res. 2010;107:1374-1386.
CrossRef | PubMed
Anversa  P., Leri  A., Kajstura  J.; Cardiac regeneration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1769-1776.
CrossRef | PubMed
Torella  D., Ellison  G.M., Mendez-Ferrer  S., Ibanez  B., Nadal-Ginard  B.; Resident human cardiac stem cells: role in cardiac cellular homeostasis and potential for myocardial regeneration. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006;3:S8-S13.
CrossRef | PubMed
Sahin  E., Depinho  R.A.; Linking functional decline of telomeres, mitochondria and stem cells during ageing. Nature. 2010;464:520-528.
CrossRef | PubMed
Mangi  A.A., Noiseux  N., Kong  D.; Mesenchymal stem cells modified with Akt prevent remodeling and restore performance of infarcted hearts. Nat Med. 2003;9:1195-1201.
CrossRef | PubMed
Noiseux  N., Gnecchi  M., Lopez-Ilasaca  M.; Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing Akt dramatically repair infarcted myocardium and improve cardiac function despite infrequent cellular fusion or differentiation. Mol Ther. 2006;14:840-850.
CrossRef | PubMed
Muraski  J.A., Rota  M., Misao  Y.; Pim-1 regulates cardiomyocyte survival downstream of Akt. Nat Med. 2007;13:1467-1475.
CrossRef | PubMed
Borillo  G.A., Mason  M., Quijada  P.; Pim-1 kinase protects mitochondrial integrity in cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2010;106:1265-1274.
CrossRef | PubMed
Shirogane  T., Fukada  T., Muller  J.M., Shima  D.T., Hibi  M., Hirano  T.; Synergistic roles for Pim-1 and c-Myc in STAT3-mediated cell cycle progression and antiapoptosis. Immunity. 1999;11:709-719.
CrossRef | PubMed
Sussman  M.A.; Mitochondrial integrity: preservation through Akt/Pim-1 kinase signaling in the cardiomyocyte. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2009;7:929-938.
CrossRef | PubMed
Macdonald  A., Campbell  D.G., Toth  R., McLauchlan  H., Hastie  C.J., Arthur  J.S.; Pim kinases phosphorylate multiple sites on Bad and promote 14-3-3 binding and dissociation from Bcl-XL. BMC Cell Biol. 2006;7:1
CrossRef | PubMed
Zhang  Y., Wang  Z., Magnuson  N.S.; Pim-1 kinase-dependent phosphorylation of p21Cip1/WAF1 regulates its stability and cellular localization in H1299 cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2007;5:909-922.
CrossRef | PubMed
Zippo  A., De Robertis  A., Bardelli  M., Galvagni  F., Oliviero  S.; Identification of Flk-1 target genes in vasculogenesis: Pim-1 is required for endothelial and mural cell differentiation in vitro. Blood. 2004;103:4536-4544.
CrossRef | PubMed
Fischer  K.M., Cottage  C.T., Wu  W.; Enhancement of myocardial regeneration through genetic engineering of cardiac progenitor cells expressing Pim-1 kinase. Circulation. 2009;120:2077-2087.
CrossRef | PubMed
Beltrami  A.P., Barlucchi  L., Torella  D.; Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003;114:763-776.
CrossRef | PubMed
Shim  W.S., Jiang  S., Wong  P.; Ex vivo differentiation of human adult bone marrow stem cells into cardiomyocyte-like cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;324:481-488.
CrossRef | PubMed
Urbanek  K., Quaini  F., Tasca  G.; Intense myocyte formation from cardiac stem cells in human cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:10440-10445.
CrossRef | PubMed
Torella  D., Rota  M., Nurzynska  D.; Cardiac stem cell and myocyte aging, heart failure, and insulin-like growth factor-1 overexpression. Circ Res. 2004;94:514-524.
CrossRef | PubMed
De Angelis  A., Piegari  E., Cappetta  D.; Anthracycline cardiomyopathy is mediated by depletion of the cardiac stem cell pool and is rescued by restoration of progenitor cell function. Circulation. 2010;121:276-292.
CrossRef | PubMed
Gnecchi  M., He  H., Noiseux  N.; Evidence supporting paracrine hypothesis for Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cell-mediated cardiac protection and functional improvement. FASEB J. 2006;20:661-669.
CrossRef | PubMed
Khan  M., Akhtar  S., Mohsin  S., N Khan  S., Riazuddin  S.; Growth factor preconditioning increases the function of diabetes-impaired mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;20:67-75.
CrossRef | PubMed
Fransioli  J., Bailey  B., Gude  N.A.; Evolution of the c-kit-positive cell response to pathological challenge in the myocardium. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1315-1324.
CrossRef | PubMed
Wang  Z., Bhattacharya  N., Mixter  P.F., Wei  W., Sedivy  J., Magnuson  N.S.; Phosphorylation of the cell cycle inhibitor p21Cip1/WAF1 by Pim-1 kinase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1593:45-55.
CrossRef | PubMed
Muraski  J.A., Fischer  K.M., Wu  W.; Pim-1 kinase antagonizes aspects of myocardial hypertrophy and compensation to pathological pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13889-13894.
CrossRef | PubMed
Cesselli  D., Beltrami  A.P., D'Aurizio  F.; Effects of age and heart failure on human cardiac stem cell function. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:349-366.
CrossRef | PubMed
Bolli  R., Chugh  A.R., D'Amario  D.; Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2011;378 :1847-1857.
CrossRef | PubMed
Willert  M., Augstein  A., Poitz  D.M., Schmeisser  A., Strasser  R.H., Braun-Dullaeus  R.C.; Transcriptional regulation of Pim-1 kinase in vascular smooth muscle cells and its role for proliferation. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010;105:267-277.
CrossRef | PubMed
Schambach  A., Baum  C.; Clinical application of lentiviral vectors—concepts and practice. Curr Gene Ther. 2008;8:474-482.
CrossRef | PubMed
Mautino  M.R.; Lentiviral vectors for gene therapy of HIV-1 infection. Curr Gene Ther. 2002;2:23-43.
CrossRef | PubMed
Lundberg  C., Bjorklund  T., Carlsson  T.; Applications of lentiviral vectors for biology and gene therapy of neurological disorders. Curr Gene Ther. 2008;8:461-473.
CrossRef | PubMed
Woods  N.B., Ooka  A., Karlsson  S.; Development of gene therapy for hematopoietic stem cells using lentiviral vectors. Leukemia. 2002;16:563-569.
CrossRef | PubMed
Modlich  U., Navarro  S., Zychlinski  D.; Insertional transformation of hematopoietic cells by self-inactivating lentiviral and gammaretroviral vectors. Mol Ther. 2009;17:1919-1928.
CrossRef | PubMed
Ahmed  R.P., Ashraf  M., Buccini  S., Shujia  J., Haider  H.; Cardiac tumorigenic potential of induced pluripotent stem cells in an immunocompetent host with myocardial infarction. Regen Med. 2011;6:171-178.
CrossRef | PubMed
Yue  P., Arai  T., Terashima  M.; Magnetic resonance imaging of progressive cardiomyopathic changes in the db/db mouse. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H2106-H2118.
CrossRef | PubMed
Trachtenberg  B., Velazquez  D.L., Williams  A.R.; Rationale and design of the Transendocardial Injection of Autologous Human Cells (bone marrow or mesenchymal) in Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure Secondary to Myocardial Infarction (TAC-HFT) trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of safety and efficacy. Am Heart J. 2011;161:487-493.
CrossRef | PubMed
Angert  D., Berretta  R.M., Kubo  H.; Repair of the injured adult heart involves new myocytes potentially derived from resident cardiac stem cells. Circ Res. 2011;108:1226-1237.
CrossRef | PubMed
Xia  X., Zhang  Y., Zieth  C.R., Zhang  S.C.; Transgenes delivered by lentiviral vector are suppressed in human embryonic stem cells in a promoter-dependent manner. Stem Cells Dev. 2007;16:167-176.
CrossRef | PubMed
Guo  L., Harihara  Y., Hirata  M.; Role of natural killer cells in allograft rejection. Transplant Proc. 2000;32:2089-2090.
CrossRef | PubMed
Huang  M., Chen  Z., Hu  S.; Novel minicircle vector for gene therapy in murine myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2009;120:S230-S237.
CrossRef | PubMed

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Enhancement of Proliferation, Mitochondrial Activity, and Telomerase Activity in hCPCeP

(A) CyQUANT assay: human cardiac progenitor cells overexpressing Pim-1 (hCPCeP) exhibited enhanced proliferation compared with human cardiac progenitor cells (hCPCs) and human cardiac progenitor cells overexpressing green fluorescent protein (hCPCe) for 3 days (n = 4). (B) CyQUANT assay: hCPCeP treated with 10 μM of quercetagetin show decreased proliferation relative to nontreated hCPCeP (n = 4). (C) Metabolic activity measured by using MTT reagent: hCPCeP demonstrated improved metabolic activity relative to hCPC and hCPCe (n = 4). (D) Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) activity is significantly higher in hCPCeP relative to hCPCe (n = 3). (E) Immunoblot analysis for p21 and p-p21. (F) Quantitation of immunoblot (n = 3). *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.05.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Increases in Cardiac Commitment of hCPCeP After Dex Differentiation

(A) Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis for hCPCe and hCPCeP after dexamethasone (Dex) treatment for MEF2C, GATA-6, and von Willebrand factor (vWF) (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.01, hCPCeP-Dex versus hCPCeP+Dex; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, hCPCe+Dex versus hCPCeP+Dex. (B, C) Immunostaining for MEF2C (cardiac), vWF (endothelial), and GATA-6 (smooth muscle) before and after Dex treatment for 7 days. GFP = green fluorescent protein; other abbreviations as in (Figure 1).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Improvement of Cardiac Performance of Mice Treated With hCPCeP 20 Weeks After Transplantation in SCID Mice

(A, B) Percentage of fractional shortening (FS) and ejection fraction (EF) measured by using echocardiography; sham: n = 6; vehicle: n = 12; hCPCe: n = 16; and hCPCeP: n = 16. (C) Hemodynamic assessment of rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt ) after cell transplantation (sham: n = 3; vehicle: n = 5; hCPCe: n = 5; and hCPCeP: n = 5). (D) Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.01, for vehicle versus hCPCeP; ϕp < 0.05, ϕϕp < 0.001, ϕϕϕp < 0.01, for hCPCe versus hCPCeP; #p < 0.01, ##p < 0.001, ###p < 0.05, for vehicle versus hCPCe. Abbreviations as in (Figure 1).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

hCPCeP Show Increases in Telomere Length, Enhancement of c-kit–Positive Cell Number, and Decreases in Fibrosis

(A) Remote and (B) infarct zone telomere length in mice treated with hCPCeP, telomere (white), GFP (green), desmin (red), and nuclei (blue). (C) Quantitation of telomere length of hCPCe and hCPCeP (p < 0.05). (D) Masson's trichrome staining for vehicle-, hCPCe-, and hCPCeP-injected SCID mice. (E) Percentage of infarcted left ventricular free wall (LVFW) in vehicle, hCPCe, and hCPCeP (n = 3), p < 0.01. (F, G) Immunostaining for c-kit (white), GFP (green), alpha-sarcomeric actin (red), and nuclei 24 (blue) in hCPCe and hCPCeP, respectively. (H) Quantitation of total number of c-kit+ cells/mm2 in vehicle, hCPCe, and hCPCeP. (I) Quantitation of GFP+ and c-kit+ cells/mm2 in hCPCe- and hCPCeP-treated animals (n = 3). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Abbreviations as in Figures (Figure 1) and (Figure 2).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

hCPCeP Augment Myocardial Repair 12 Weeks After Transplantation

Immunolabeling for (A) GFP (green), alpha-sarcomeric actin (red), and nuclei (blue). (B) SM22 (white), GFP (green), alpha-sarcomeric actin (red), and nuclei (blue). (C) vW (white), GFP (green), alpha-sarcomeric actin (red), and nuclei (blue). (D) Quantitation of SM22, vWF and alpha-sarcomeric actin in hCPCe and hCPCeP (p < 0.001). Boxes indicate enlarged areas. Scale bars = 150 μm for all panels except row A, where hCPCe and hCPCeP widefield images = 50 μm and insets = 25 μm. Abbreviations as in Figures (Figure 1), (Figure 2), and (Figure 4).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Enhancement of hCPCeP Persistence

(A) Firefly luciferase (Luc) reporter construct. (B) Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) imaging: pseudocolor images representing signal intensity in mice treated with hCPCe-Luc (top) and hCPCeP-Luc (bottom) after myocardial infarction. hCPCe-Luc signal was not detected 7 days after transplantation whereas hCPCeP-luc shows signal throughout the experimental cohort for 56 days. (C) Quantitation of pseudocolor images represented in maximum radiance (p/s/cm2/sr). Abbreviations as in (Figure 1).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Echocardiography and MRI of Mice 8 Weeks After Myocardial Infarction

(A) Echocardiographic images from hCPCe-Luc and hCPCeP- Luc, (B) left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd), (C) left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESd), and (D) anterior wall (AW) thickness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): (E) MRI images, (F) left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), (G) ejection fraction percentage (EF%), and (H) left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). *p < 0.05 versus hCPCe. Abbreviations as in (Figure 1).

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

References

Bearzi  C., Rota  M., Hosoda  T.; Human cardiac stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:14068-14073.
CrossRef | PubMed
Hosoda  T., D'Amario  D., Cabral-Da-Silva  M.C.; Clonality of mouse and human cardiomyogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17169-17174.
CrossRef | PubMed
Cesselli  D., Beltrami  A.P., D'Aurizio  F.; Effects of age and heart failure on human cardiac stem cell function. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:349-366.
CrossRef | PubMed
Kajstura  J., Gurusamy  N., Ogorek  B.; Myocyte turnover in the aging human heart. Circ Res. 2010;107:1374-1386.
CrossRef | PubMed
Anversa  P., Leri  A., Kajstura  J.; Cardiac regeneration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1769-1776.
CrossRef | PubMed
Torella  D., Ellison  G.M., Mendez-Ferrer  S., Ibanez  B., Nadal-Ginard  B.; Resident human cardiac stem cells: role in cardiac cellular homeostasis and potential for myocardial regeneration. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006;3:S8-S13.
CrossRef | PubMed
Sahin  E., Depinho  R.A.; Linking functional decline of telomeres, mitochondria and stem cells during ageing. Nature. 2010;464:520-528.
CrossRef | PubMed
Mangi  A.A., Noiseux  N., Kong  D.; Mesenchymal stem cells modified with Akt prevent remodeling and restore performance of infarcted hearts. Nat Med. 2003;9:1195-1201.
CrossRef | PubMed
Noiseux  N., Gnecchi  M., Lopez-Ilasaca  M.; Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing Akt dramatically repair infarcted myocardium and improve cardiac function despite infrequent cellular fusion or differentiation. Mol Ther. 2006;14:840-850.
CrossRef | PubMed
Muraski  J.A., Rota  M., Misao  Y.; Pim-1 regulates cardiomyocyte survival downstream of Akt. Nat Med. 2007;13:1467-1475.
CrossRef | PubMed
Borillo  G.A., Mason  M., Quijada  P.; Pim-1 kinase protects mitochondrial integrity in cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2010;106:1265-1274.
CrossRef | PubMed
Shirogane  T., Fukada  T., Muller  J.M., Shima  D.T., Hibi  M., Hirano  T.; Synergistic roles for Pim-1 and c-Myc in STAT3-mediated cell cycle progression and antiapoptosis. Immunity. 1999;11:709-719.
CrossRef | PubMed
Sussman  M.A.; Mitochondrial integrity: preservation through Akt/Pim-1 kinase signaling in the cardiomyocyte. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2009;7:929-938.
CrossRef | PubMed
Macdonald  A., Campbell  D.G., Toth  R., McLauchlan  H., Hastie  C.J., Arthur  J.S.; Pim kinases phosphorylate multiple sites on Bad and promote 14-3-3 binding and dissociation from Bcl-XL. BMC Cell Biol. 2006;7:1
CrossRef | PubMed
Zhang  Y., Wang  Z., Magnuson  N.S.; Pim-1 kinase-dependent phosphorylation of p21Cip1/WAF1 regulates its stability and cellular localization in H1299 cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2007;5:909-922.
CrossRef | PubMed
Zippo  A., De Robertis  A., Bardelli  M., Galvagni  F., Oliviero  S.; Identification of Flk-1 target genes in vasculogenesis: Pim-1 is required for endothelial and mural cell differentiation in vitro. Blood. 2004;103:4536-4544.
CrossRef | PubMed
Fischer  K.M., Cottage  C.T., Wu  W.; Enhancement of myocardial regeneration through genetic engineering of cardiac progenitor cells expressing Pim-1 kinase. Circulation. 2009;120:2077-2087.
CrossRef | PubMed
Beltrami  A.P., Barlucchi  L., Torella  D.; Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003;114:763-776.
CrossRef | PubMed
Shim  W.S., Jiang  S., Wong  P.; Ex vivo differentiation of human adult bone marrow stem cells into cardiomyocyte-like cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;324:481-488.
CrossRef | PubMed
Urbanek  K., Quaini  F., Tasca  G.; Intense myocyte formation from cardiac stem cells in human cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:10440-10445.
CrossRef | PubMed
Torella  D., Rota  M., Nurzynska  D.; Cardiac stem cell and myocyte aging, heart failure, and insulin-like growth factor-1 overexpression. Circ Res. 2004;94:514-524.
CrossRef | PubMed
De Angelis  A., Piegari  E., Cappetta  D.; Anthracycline cardiomyopathy is mediated by depletion of the cardiac stem cell pool and is rescued by restoration of progenitor cell function. Circulation. 2010;121:276-292.
CrossRef | PubMed
Gnecchi  M., He  H., Noiseux  N.; Evidence supporting paracrine hypothesis for Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cell-mediated cardiac protection and functional improvement. FASEB J. 2006;20:661-669.
CrossRef | PubMed
Khan  M., Akhtar  S., Mohsin  S., N Khan  S., Riazuddin  S.; Growth factor preconditioning increases the function of diabetes-impaired mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;20:67-75.
CrossRef | PubMed
Fransioli  J., Bailey  B., Gude  N.A.; Evolution of the c-kit-positive cell response to pathological challenge in the myocardium. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1315-1324.
CrossRef | PubMed
Wang  Z., Bhattacharya  N., Mixter  P.F., Wei  W., Sedivy  J., Magnuson  N.S.; Phosphorylation of the cell cycle inhibitor p21Cip1/WAF1 by Pim-1 kinase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1593:45-55.
CrossRef | PubMed
Muraski  J.A., Fischer  K.M., Wu  W.; Pim-1 kinase antagonizes aspects of myocardial hypertrophy and compensation to pathological pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13889-13894.
CrossRef | PubMed
Cesselli  D., Beltrami  A.P., D'Aurizio  F.; Effects of age and heart failure on human cardiac stem cell function. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:349-366.
CrossRef | PubMed
Bolli  R., Chugh  A.R., D'Amario  D.; Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2011;378 :1847-1857.
CrossRef | PubMed
Willert  M., Augstein  A., Poitz  D.M., Schmeisser  A., Strasser  R.H., Braun-Dullaeus  R.C.; Transcriptional regulation of Pim-1 kinase in vascular smooth muscle cells and its role for proliferation. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010;105:267-277.
CrossRef | PubMed
Schambach  A., Baum  C.; Clinical application of lentiviral vectors—concepts and practice. Curr Gene Ther. 2008;8:474-482.
CrossRef | PubMed
Mautino  M.R.; Lentiviral vectors for gene therapy of HIV-1 infection. Curr Gene Ther. 2002;2:23-43.
CrossRef | PubMed
Lundberg  C., Bjorklund  T., Carlsson  T.; Applications of lentiviral vectors for biology and gene therapy of neurological disorders. Curr Gene Ther. 2008;8:461-473.
CrossRef | PubMed
Woods  N.B., Ooka  A., Karlsson  S.; Development of gene therapy for hematopoietic stem cells using lentiviral vectors. Leukemia. 2002;16:563-569.
CrossRef | PubMed
Modlich  U., Navarro  S., Zychlinski  D.; Insertional transformation of hematopoietic cells by self-inactivating lentiviral and gammaretroviral vectors. Mol Ther. 2009;17:1919-1928.
CrossRef | PubMed
Ahmed  R.P., Ashraf  M., Buccini  S., Shujia  J., Haider  H.; Cardiac tumorigenic potential of induced pluripotent stem cells in an immunocompetent host with myocardial infarction. Regen Med. 2011;6:171-178.
CrossRef | PubMed
Yue  P., Arai  T., Terashima  M.; Magnetic resonance imaging of progressive cardiomyopathic changes in the db/db mouse. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H2106-H2118.
CrossRef | PubMed
Trachtenberg  B., Velazquez  D.L., Williams  A.R.; Rationale and design of the Transendocardial Injection of Autologous Human Cells (bone marrow or mesenchymal) in Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure Secondary to Myocardial Infarction (TAC-HFT) trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of safety and efficacy. Am Heart J. 2011;161:487-493.
CrossRef | PubMed
Angert  D., Berretta  R.M., Kubo  H.; Repair of the injured adult heart involves new myocytes potentially derived from resident cardiac stem cells. Circ Res. 2011;108:1226-1237.
CrossRef | PubMed
Xia  X., Zhang  Y., Zieth  C.R., Zhang  S.C.; Transgenes delivered by lentiviral vector are suppressed in human embryonic stem cells in a promoter-dependent manner. Stem Cells Dev. 2007;16:167-176.
CrossRef | PubMed
Guo  L., Harihara  Y., Hirata  M.; Role of natural killer cells in allograft rejection. Transplant Proc. 2000;32:2089-2090.
CrossRef | PubMed
Huang  M., Chen  Z., Hu  S.; Novel minicircle vector for gene therapy in murine myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2009;120:S230-S237.
CrossRef | PubMed

Correspondence

Latest JACC CME

Continuing Medical Education through JACC is a convenient way to fulfill your CME requirements while learning important information about the latest advances in cardiovascular medicine.

April 2013- JACC CME Activity
Repeat Revascularization and Outcome

March 2013- JACC CME Activity
Extreme Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Improved Cardiovascular Risk Prediction

Feb 2013- JACC CME Activity
Results from the BARI 2D Trial

Jan 2013- JACC CME Activity
Prognosis Among Healthy Individuals Discharged With a Primary Diagnosis of Syncope

Dec 2012- JACC CME Activity
Incidence of Heart Failure or Cardiomyopathy After Adjuvant Trastuzumab Therapy for Breast Cancer

Nov 2012- JACC CME Activity
A Collaborative Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 10 Randomized Trials

Oct 2012- JACC CME Activity
Radiofrequency Ablation of Premature Ventricular Ectopy Improves the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Nonresponders

Sept 2012- JACC CME Activity
Exercise and Pharmacological Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

Aug 2012- JACC CME Activity
Reduction in Life-Threatening Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Statin-Treated Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Enrolled in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)

July 2012- JACC CME Activity
Relationship of Beta-Blocker Dose With Outcomes in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients With Systolic Dysfunction

For previous CME quizzes, please follow this link to CardioSource Lifelong Learning and MOC.

 

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Editorial Content
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles